Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era

The 1992 Charlottetown Accord attempted to constitutionalize the inherent Aboriginal right of self-government. The Accord was the result of a long series of public consultations and intense political negotiations which resulted in a document that was rejected by a majority of Canadians. The Aborigin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Isaac, Thomas
Other Authors: Greschner, Donna
Format: Others
Language:en
Published: University of Saskatchewan 2007
Subjects:
Online Access:http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-01182007-131938/
id ndltd-USASK-oai-usask.ca-etd-01182007-131938
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-USASK-oai-usask.ca-etd-01182007-1319382013-01-08T16:32:41Z Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era Isaac, Thomas aboriginal self-government Charlottetown Accord The 1992 Charlottetown Accord attempted to constitutionalize the inherent Aboriginal right of self-government. The Accord was the result of a long series of public consultations and intense political negotiations which resulted in a document that was rejected by a majority of Canadians. The Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord do not represent the majority of essential elements for Aboriginal peoples to recognize and implement the inherent right of self-government. However, the Accord represents a major change in thinking for the federal and provincial governments in Canada in that the inherent right was recognized. As well, many of the principles contained in the Accord provide a bench mark for future constitutional discussions regarding self- government. Aboriginal governments must be given a substantive legislative and fiscal base if self-government is to be realized. The Accord failed to meet these fundamental needs. Greschner, Donna University of Saskatchewan 2007-01-18 text application/pdf http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-01182007-131938/ http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-01182007-131938/ en unrestricted I hereby certify that, if appropriate, I have obtained and attached hereto a written permission statement from the owner(s) of each third party copyrighted matter to be included in my thesis, dissertation, or project report, allowing distribution as specified below. I certify that the version I submitted is the same as that approved by my advisory committee. I hereby grant to University of Saskatchewan or its agents the non-exclusive license to archive and make accessible, under the conditions specified below, my thesis, dissertation, or project report in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known. I retain all other ownership rights to the copyright of the thesis, dissertation or project report. I also retain the right to use in future works (such as articles or books) all or part of this thesis, dissertation, or project report.
collection NDLTD
language en
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic aboriginal
self-government
Charlottetown Accord
spellingShingle aboriginal
self-government
Charlottetown Accord
Isaac, Thomas
Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era
description The 1992 Charlottetown Accord attempted to constitutionalize the inherent Aboriginal right of self-government. The Accord was the result of a long series of public consultations and intense political negotiations which resulted in a document that was rejected by a majority of Canadians. The Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord do not represent the majority of essential elements for Aboriginal peoples to recognize and implement the inherent right of self-government. However, the Accord represents a major change in thinking for the federal and provincial governments in Canada in that the inherent right was recognized. As well, many of the principles contained in the Accord provide a bench mark for future constitutional discussions regarding self- government. Aboriginal governments must be given a substantive legislative and fiscal base if self-government is to be realized. The Accord failed to meet these fundamental needs.
author2 Greschner, Donna
author_facet Greschner, Donna
Isaac, Thomas
author Isaac, Thomas
author_sort Isaac, Thomas
title Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era
title_short Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era
title_full Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era
title_fullStr Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of the Aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 Charlottetown Accord : self-government in the "post-Charlottetown" era
title_sort analysis of the aboriginal government provisions of the 1992 charlottetown accord : self-government in the "post-charlottetown" era
publisher University of Saskatchewan
publishDate 2007
url http://library.usask.ca/theses/available/etd-01182007-131938/
work_keys_str_mv AT isaacthomas analysisoftheaboriginalgovernmentprovisionsofthe1992charlottetownaccordselfgovernmentinthepostcharlottetownera
_version_ 1716532046414741504