Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire

Flowcytometric technology has been widely used for measurement of the absolute numbers of T-lymphocytes subsets in Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV), defining the disease state, monitoring antiviral treatment, and identifying any risk for opportunistic infections. A manual preparing of the samples...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Yazdan Panah, Haleh
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för medicinsk biokemi och mikrobiologi 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7138
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-7138
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-71382013-01-08T13:13:22ZAnalysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn SapphireengYazdan Panah, HalehUppsala universitet, Institutionen för medicinsk biokemi och mikrobiologiUppsala : Universitetsbiblioteket2006EPICS XLCelldyn SapphireHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)flowcytometryCelldyn 4000Clinical chemistryKlinisk kemiFlowcytometric technology has been widely used for measurement of the absolute numbers of T-lymphocytes subsets in Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV), defining the disease state, monitoring antiviral treatment, and identifying any risk for opportunistic infections. A manual preparing of the samples is required. More recently an automated and enclosed blood cell counting, Celldyn Sapphire has been introduced. In this study the performance of the Flow cytometer EPICS XL as a reference method for analysis of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8 T-lymphocytes was evaluated with blood from 40 individual’s samples. EPICS XL was also compared with Celldyn Sapphire in the analysis of T-lymphocyte subsets in 39 blood samples from patients with low, high and normal lymphocyte counts. The result showed that the precision was high for both EPICS XL (2.5%) and Celldyn (10%). The method was linear over a wide range. Comparisons of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T-lymphocytes analysis showed high coefficients of correlation (r0.9) and agreement (y>0.9x) between two instruments. A lower degree of agreement was observed at low concentration of CD3+ and CD4+ T-lymphocytes (0.757, 0.739). This means that cell counts obtained by Celldyn were 30% lower than those obtained with EPICS XL. This study shows that both EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire were suitable for CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts. It is however preferable to use Flowcytometry for counting of low concentration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes (<200 cells/µL). Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7138application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic EPICS XL
Celldyn Sapphire
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
flowcytometry
Celldyn 4000
Clinical chemistry
Klinisk kemi
spellingShingle EPICS XL
Celldyn Sapphire
Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
flowcytometry
Celldyn 4000
Clinical chemistry
Klinisk kemi
Yazdan Panah, Haleh
Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire
description Flowcytometric technology has been widely used for measurement of the absolute numbers of T-lymphocytes subsets in Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV), defining the disease state, monitoring antiviral treatment, and identifying any risk for opportunistic infections. A manual preparing of the samples is required. More recently an automated and enclosed blood cell counting, Celldyn Sapphire has been introduced. In this study the performance of the Flow cytometer EPICS XL as a reference method for analysis of CD3+, CD4+ and CD8 T-lymphocytes was evaluated with blood from 40 individual’s samples. EPICS XL was also compared with Celldyn Sapphire in the analysis of T-lymphocyte subsets in 39 blood samples from patients with low, high and normal lymphocyte counts. The result showed that the precision was high for both EPICS XL (2.5%) and Celldyn (10%). The method was linear over a wide range. Comparisons of CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ T-lymphocytes analysis showed high coefficients of correlation (r0.9) and agreement (y>0.9x) between two instruments. A lower degree of agreement was observed at low concentration of CD3+ and CD4+ T-lymphocytes (0.757, 0.739). This means that cell counts obtained by Celldyn were 30% lower than those obtained with EPICS XL. This study shows that both EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire were suitable for CD4+ and CD8+ T cell counts. It is however preferable to use Flowcytometry for counting of low concentration of CD4+ T-lymphocytes (<200 cells/µL).
author Yazdan Panah, Haleh
author_facet Yazdan Panah, Haleh
author_sort Yazdan Panah, Haleh
title Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire
title_short Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire
title_full Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire
title_fullStr Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of CD4+ and CD8+ T-lymphocytes : A comparison between EPICS XL and Celldyn Sapphire
title_sort analysis of cd4+ and cd8+ t-lymphocytes : a comparison between epics xl and celldyn sapphire
publisher Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för medicinsk biokemi och mikrobiologi
publishDate 2006
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-7138
work_keys_str_mv AT yazdanpanahhaleh analysisofcd4andcd8tlymphocytesacomparisonbetweenepicsxlandcelldynsapphire
_version_ 1716512544028360704