Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians

In 2017, almost 1 out of 10 medical certificates regarding sick leave needed additional completion since the judging authority, Försäkringskassan, deemed that they lacked critical information. This is considered a big pain for both health care, Försäkringskassan and the patient, since it prolongs th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anton Björsell, Anton Björsell
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för informationsteknologi 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-371454
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-371454
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-3714542018-12-21T05:56:59ZEvaluating Supportive Formsfor PhysiciansengAnton Björsell, Anton BjörsellUppsala universitet, Institutionen för informationsteknologi2018Engineering and TechnologyTeknik och teknologierIn 2017, almost 1 out of 10 medical certificates regarding sick leave needed additional completion since the judging authority, Försäkringskassan, deemed that they lacked critical information. This is considered a big pain for both health care, Försäkringskassan and the patient, since it prolongs the process and claims additional resources. To help physicians write better medical certificates, the company Inera has investigated the possibility of supportive functionality in the issuing form. The idea is that when a physician writes the certificate, the web form will have one or more tools to help phrase the content in a more high-quality manner. In collaboration with Inera, Uppsala Region and EPJ (part of Uppsala Region), this study evaluated four different prototypes of said supportive functionalities for physicians. Both the perspectives of project stakeholders, end users (physicians) and Försäkringskassan were considered. The method included 12 usability evaluations and post-evaluation interviews, a usercentered workshop, and an expert review of the generated certificates (byFörsäkringskassan). Additionally, three stakeholder interviews were held with the representatives of the project, as well as a heuristic evaluation of the prototypes’design. The theoretical foundation was mainly based on the concept of UserExperience and how user interfaces should be designed in respect to perception and visual principles. Conclusively, the results indicate that physicians prefer supportive tools that are semi-automatic. A tool that is fully automated feels somewhat insecure, even if the time saving features are appreciated. One of the important findings is the need of user empowerment, meaning that the users prefer supportive web form functionalities where mundane tasks are automated and still gives the user roomfor being the expert. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-371454IT ; 18013application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Engineering and Technology
Teknik och teknologier
spellingShingle Engineering and Technology
Teknik och teknologier
Anton Björsell, Anton Björsell
Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians
description In 2017, almost 1 out of 10 medical certificates regarding sick leave needed additional completion since the judging authority, Försäkringskassan, deemed that they lacked critical information. This is considered a big pain for both health care, Försäkringskassan and the patient, since it prolongs the process and claims additional resources. To help physicians write better medical certificates, the company Inera has investigated the possibility of supportive functionality in the issuing form. The idea is that when a physician writes the certificate, the web form will have one or more tools to help phrase the content in a more high-quality manner. In collaboration with Inera, Uppsala Region and EPJ (part of Uppsala Region), this study evaluated four different prototypes of said supportive functionalities for physicians. Both the perspectives of project stakeholders, end users (physicians) and Försäkringskassan were considered. The method included 12 usability evaluations and post-evaluation interviews, a usercentered workshop, and an expert review of the generated certificates (byFörsäkringskassan). Additionally, three stakeholder interviews were held with the representatives of the project, as well as a heuristic evaluation of the prototypes’design. The theoretical foundation was mainly based on the concept of UserExperience and how user interfaces should be designed in respect to perception and visual principles. Conclusively, the results indicate that physicians prefer supportive tools that are semi-automatic. A tool that is fully automated feels somewhat insecure, even if the time saving features are appreciated. One of the important findings is the need of user empowerment, meaning that the users prefer supportive web form functionalities where mundane tasks are automated and still gives the user roomfor being the expert.
author Anton Björsell, Anton Björsell
author_facet Anton Björsell, Anton Björsell
author_sort Anton Björsell, Anton Björsell
title Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians
title_short Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians
title_full Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians
title_fullStr Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating Supportive Formsfor Physicians
title_sort evaluating supportive formsfor physicians
publisher Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för informationsteknologi
publishDate 2018
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-371454
work_keys_str_mv AT antonbjorsellantonbjorsell evaluatingsupportiveformsforphysicians
_version_ 1718804885734948864