Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen

Archaeology is a popular subject that is often depicted in popular media. Archaeology is also an academic field that contributes to national and individual identities. Therefor archaeologists conducting research need to be aware of the political and ethical implications their work may have. This ess...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rebecka, Engström
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Uppsala universitet, Arkeologi 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-325105
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-325105
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-3251052017-06-22T05:34:40ZDen arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologensweThe Archeaological Communication and the privileged archaeologist.Rebecka, EngströmUppsala universitet, Arkeologi2017Kommunikationtredje uppgiftenförmedlingforskningarkeologerPublik arkeologiCommunicationuniversityarchaeologistmediascientistPublic archaeologyArchaeologyArkeologiArchaeology is a popular subject that is often depicted in popular media. Archaeology is also an academic field that contributes to national and individual identities. Therefor archaeologists conducting research need to be aware of the political and ethical implications their work may have. This essay presents and discuss previous research done about archaeologists and their communication efforts. Moreover, the essay also presents scientist communication goals and tries to discuss it in relation to Uppsala University’s and the department of Archaeology and Ancient History goals and guidelines. The discussion is based largely on a survey made by the author. Questions discussed are: who should write about archaeology? Would a better communication create a more “correct” use of history? Who has the right to write about archaeology? Is Uppsala University’s goals in line with how the scientist perceive and conduct their communication mission? The essay is based on previous research and a survey conducted by the author. The survey was sent to eight archaeology professors active at Campus Gotland, Uppsala university. Five responded to the survey. The method used in the essay is comparative literature analysis. The result of the survey is discussed in relation to Uppsala university and departments goals. The essay shows that archaeologists need more time to be able to conduct their communication goals more efficient and at a higher volume than present. The essay also states that archaeologists often have other work-related priorities than communication with the adjacent society. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-325105application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Kommunikation
tredje uppgiften
förmedling
forskning
arkeologer
Publik arkeologi
Communication
university
archaeologist
media
scientist
Public archaeology
Archaeology
Arkeologi
spellingShingle Kommunikation
tredje uppgiften
förmedling
forskning
arkeologer
Publik arkeologi
Communication
university
archaeologist
media
scientist
Public archaeology
Archaeology
Arkeologi
Rebecka, Engström
Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
description Archaeology is a popular subject that is often depicted in popular media. Archaeology is also an academic field that contributes to national and individual identities. Therefor archaeologists conducting research need to be aware of the political and ethical implications their work may have. This essay presents and discuss previous research done about archaeologists and their communication efforts. Moreover, the essay also presents scientist communication goals and tries to discuss it in relation to Uppsala University’s and the department of Archaeology and Ancient History goals and guidelines. The discussion is based largely on a survey made by the author. Questions discussed are: who should write about archaeology? Would a better communication create a more “correct” use of history? Who has the right to write about archaeology? Is Uppsala University’s goals in line with how the scientist perceive and conduct their communication mission? The essay is based on previous research and a survey conducted by the author. The survey was sent to eight archaeology professors active at Campus Gotland, Uppsala university. Five responded to the survey. The method used in the essay is comparative literature analysis. The result of the survey is discussed in relation to Uppsala university and departments goals. The essay shows that archaeologists need more time to be able to conduct their communication goals more efficient and at a higher volume than present. The essay also states that archaeologists often have other work-related priorities than communication with the adjacent society.
author Rebecka, Engström
author_facet Rebecka, Engström
author_sort Rebecka, Engström
title Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
title_short Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
title_full Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
title_fullStr Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
title_full_unstemmed Den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
title_sort den arkeologiska kommunikationen och den privilegierade arkeologen
publisher Uppsala universitet, Arkeologi
publishDate 2017
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-325105
work_keys_str_mv AT rebeckaengstrom denarkeologiskakommunikationenochdenprivilegieradearkeologen
AT rebeckaengstrom thearcheaologicalcommunicationandtheprivilegedarchaeologist
_version_ 1718462095215820800