A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics
Micromagnetism is the study of magnetic materials on the microscopic length scale (of nano to micrometers), this scale does not take quantum mechanical effects into account, but is small enough to neglect certain macroscopic effects of magnetism in a material. The Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equat...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Uppsala universitet, Avdelningen för beräkningsvetenskap
2017
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-323537 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-323537 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-3235372018-01-14T05:10:44ZA Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic MicromagneticsengWredh, SimonKroner, AntonBerg, TomasUppsala universitet, Avdelningen för beräkningsvetenskapUppsala universitet, Avdelningen för beräkningsvetenskapUppsala universitet, Avdelningen för beräkningsvetenskap2017LLG equationMicromagnetismImplicit midpointMidpoint extrapolationProjection methodOther Computer and Information ScienceAnnan data- och informationsvetenskapComputational MathematicsBeräkningsmatematikMicromagnetism is the study of magnetic materials on the microscopic length scale (of nano to micrometers), this scale does not take quantum mechanical effects into account, but is small enough to neglect certain macroscopic effects of magnetism in a material. The Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation is used within micromagnetism to determine the time evolution of the magnetisation vector field in a ferromagnetic solid. It is a partial differential equation with high non linearity, which makes it very difficult so solve analytically. Thus numerical methods have been developed for approximating the solution using computers. In this report we compare the performance of three different numerical methods for the LLG equation, the implicit midpoint method (IMP), the midpoint with extrapolation method (MPE), and the Gauss-Seidel Projection method (GSPM). It was found that all methods have convergence rates as expected; second order for IMP and MPE, and first order for GSPM. Energy conserving properties of the schemes were analysed and neither MPE or GSPM conserve energy. The computational time required for each method was determined to be very large for the IMP method in comparison to the other two. Suggestions for different areas of use for each method are provided. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-323537TVE ; TVE-F 17 005 majapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
LLG equation Micromagnetism Implicit midpoint Midpoint extrapolation Projection method Other Computer and Information Science Annan data- och informationsvetenskap Computational Mathematics Beräkningsmatematik |
spellingShingle |
LLG equation Micromagnetism Implicit midpoint Midpoint extrapolation Projection method Other Computer and Information Science Annan data- och informationsvetenskap Computational Mathematics Beräkningsmatematik Wredh, Simon Kroner, Anton Berg, Tomas A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics |
description |
Micromagnetism is the study of magnetic materials on the microscopic length scale (of nano to micrometers), this scale does not take quantum mechanical effects into account, but is small enough to neglect certain macroscopic effects of magnetism in a material. The Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert (LLG) equation is used within micromagnetism to determine the time evolution of the magnetisation vector field in a ferromagnetic solid. It is a partial differential equation with high non linearity, which makes it very difficult so solve analytically. Thus numerical methods have been developed for approximating the solution using computers. In this report we compare the performance of three different numerical methods for the LLG equation, the implicit midpoint method (IMP), the midpoint with extrapolation method (MPE), and the Gauss-Seidel Projection method (GSPM). It was found that all methods have convergence rates as expected; second order for IMP and MPE, and first order for GSPM. Energy conserving properties of the schemes were analysed and neither MPE or GSPM conserve energy. The computational time required for each method was determined to be very large for the IMP method in comparison to the other two. Suggestions for different areas of use for each method are provided. |
author |
Wredh, Simon Kroner, Anton Berg, Tomas |
author_facet |
Wredh, Simon Kroner, Anton Berg, Tomas |
author_sort |
Wredh, Simon |
title |
A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics |
title_short |
A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics |
title_full |
A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics |
title_fullStr |
A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics |
title_full_unstemmed |
A Comparison of Three Time-stepping Methods for the LLG Equation in Dynamic Micromagnetics |
title_sort |
comparison of three time-stepping methods for the llg equation in dynamic micromagnetics |
publisher |
Uppsala universitet, Avdelningen för beräkningsvetenskap |
publishDate |
2017 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-323537 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT wredhsimon acomparisonofthreetimesteppingmethodsforthellgequationindynamicmicromagnetics AT kroneranton acomparisonofthreetimesteppingmethodsforthellgequationindynamicmicromagnetics AT bergtomas acomparisonofthreetimesteppingmethodsforthellgequationindynamicmicromagnetics AT wredhsimon comparisonofthreetimesteppingmethodsforthellgequationindynamicmicromagnetics AT kroneranton comparisonofthreetimesteppingmethodsforthellgequationindynamicmicromagnetics AT bergtomas comparisonofthreetimesteppingmethodsforthellgequationindynamicmicromagnetics |
_version_ |
1718609426433179648 |