Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes

In order to keep the turnaround time it is desirable to have few centrifugal programs and be able to centrifuge microtainer tubes together with vacutainer tubes. BD has launched a new type of microtainer tube that got a lower g-force than the older one on the same centrifugation program. The aims wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Molin, Elin
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för kvinnors och barns hälsa 2016
Subjects:
PST
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305970
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-305970
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-3059702017-09-05T05:14:48ZEvaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubessweMolin, ElinUppsala universitet, Institutionen för kvinnors och barns hälsa2016Preanalytic errorLithium-heparin evaluationPSTrelative centrifugal forceclinical chemistryAnalytical interferenceClinical MedicineKlinisk medicinIn order to keep the turnaround time it is desirable to have few centrifugal programs and be able to centrifuge microtainer tubes together with vacutainer tubes. BD has launched a new type of microtainer tube that got a lower g-force than the older one on the same centrifugation program. The aims was to compare this program and three other, more powerful, programs and compare the impact on some common analytes and serum indices, especially on hemolysis. Three test parts was performed using venous samples taken from healthy individuals, 1) transfer of whole blood from serum tube to microtainer tubes, a clinical chemistry analysis; 2) whole blood from plasma tube to microtainer tubes, a clinical chemistry analysis and 3) whole blood from plasma tube to microtainer tubes for platelet count analysis. All tubes were examined for gel formation. The result showed a significant variance between some settings for some analytes but foremost at 899g and at 2000g, both in 10 min. The platelet count was below the threshold limit at 2000g. No tube had insufficient formation of the gel. The setting of 2000g was found suitable for microtainer tubes. These results correspond with the recommended settings from BD. Further studies are needed with more analytes and test subjects and a simulated transport time for plasma, because of the increased risk for hemolysis, to confirm if the same setting can be used for microtainer tubes (899g) as for the older microtainer tube and vacutainer tube (1300g). Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305970application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Preanalytic error
Lithium-heparin evaluation
PST
relative centrifugal force
clinical chemistry
Analytical interference
Clinical Medicine
Klinisk medicin
spellingShingle Preanalytic error
Lithium-heparin evaluation
PST
relative centrifugal force
clinical chemistry
Analytical interference
Clinical Medicine
Klinisk medicin
Molin, Elin
Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes
description In order to keep the turnaround time it is desirable to have few centrifugal programs and be able to centrifuge microtainer tubes together with vacutainer tubes. BD has launched a new type of microtainer tube that got a lower g-force than the older one on the same centrifugation program. The aims was to compare this program and three other, more powerful, programs and compare the impact on some common analytes and serum indices, especially on hemolysis. Three test parts was performed using venous samples taken from healthy individuals, 1) transfer of whole blood from serum tube to microtainer tubes, a clinical chemistry analysis; 2) whole blood from plasma tube to microtainer tubes, a clinical chemistry analysis and 3) whole blood from plasma tube to microtainer tubes for platelet count analysis. All tubes were examined for gel formation. The result showed a significant variance between some settings for some analytes but foremost at 899g and at 2000g, both in 10 min. The platelet count was below the threshold limit at 2000g. No tube had insufficient formation of the gel. The setting of 2000g was found suitable for microtainer tubes. These results correspond with the recommended settings from BD. Further studies are needed with more analytes and test subjects and a simulated transport time for plasma, because of the increased risk for hemolysis, to confirm if the same setting can be used for microtainer tubes (899g) as for the older microtainer tube and vacutainer tube (1300g).
author Molin, Elin
author_facet Molin, Elin
author_sort Molin, Elin
title Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes
title_short Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes
title_full Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes
title_fullStr Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of different centrifugation settings using BD Microtainer® tubes
title_sort evaluation of different centrifugation settings using bd microtainer® tubes
publisher Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för kvinnors och barns hälsa
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305970
work_keys_str_mv AT molinelin evaluationofdifferentcentrifugationsettingsusingbdmicrotainertubes
_version_ 1718527543861051392