No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity

The focus of this study is on creativity and how place can affect it. Previous research on the subject has provided many answers to how and why places affect creativity, much because of the fact that a place can be such many things: a work place, a university, a city, a country – the list is endless...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Anthin, Alexander
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Uppsala universitet, Sociologiska institutionen 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305926
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-305926
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-3059262016-10-26T05:16:11ZNo Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative CreativityengAnthin, AlexanderUppsala universitet, Sociologiska institutionen2016Collaborative CreativityPlaceFranceParisThe ImpressionistsHistorical StudyDocument Research and AnalysisThe focus of this study is on creativity and how place can affect it. Previous research on the subject has provided many answers to how and why places affect creativity, much because of the fact that a place can be such many things: a work place, a university, a city, a country – the list is endless. Studies have as such provided different answers in regards to the impact place can have on creativity, because they have investigated the impact of different sorts of places. However, what these studies have failed to clarify or acknowledge is that places exist within the boundaries of other places, and are as such inseparable if one are to ultimately understand the impact place has had on a creative outcome. In order to address this problem I have divided the concept of place into three abstract and physical levels: macro, meso, and micro. By applying this perspective on the historical example of the emergence of the Impressionists in Paris, France during the latter half of the 19th century I was able to distinguish how France as a nation, Paris as a city, and buildings such as cafés, artistic studios, and museums all contributed in different, but equally important, ways to the formation, cohesion and creative output of the Impressionists. As such, this study serves as an example that shows how collaborative creativity emerges within the boundaries of several places positioned on different abstract and physical levels; thus, it is only when we combine the different ways that each of these places contribute to creative collaboration that we are able to make any conclusions in regards to the impact place has had on its formation and creative output. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305926application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Collaborative Creativity
Place
France
Paris
The Impressionists
Historical Study
Document Research and Analysis
spellingShingle Collaborative Creativity
Place
France
Paris
The Impressionists
Historical Study
Document Research and Analysis
Anthin, Alexander
No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity
description The focus of this study is on creativity and how place can affect it. Previous research on the subject has provided many answers to how and why places affect creativity, much because of the fact that a place can be such many things: a work place, a university, a city, a country – the list is endless. Studies have as such provided different answers in regards to the impact place can have on creativity, because they have investigated the impact of different sorts of places. However, what these studies have failed to clarify or acknowledge is that places exist within the boundaries of other places, and are as such inseparable if one are to ultimately understand the impact place has had on a creative outcome. In order to address this problem I have divided the concept of place into three abstract and physical levels: macro, meso, and micro. By applying this perspective on the historical example of the emergence of the Impressionists in Paris, France during the latter half of the 19th century I was able to distinguish how France as a nation, Paris as a city, and buildings such as cafés, artistic studios, and museums all contributed in different, but equally important, ways to the formation, cohesion and creative output of the Impressionists. As such, this study serves as an example that shows how collaborative creativity emerges within the boundaries of several places positioned on different abstract and physical levels; thus, it is only when we combine the different ways that each of these places contribute to creative collaboration that we are able to make any conclusions in regards to the impact place has had on its formation and creative output.
author Anthin, Alexander
author_facet Anthin, Alexander
author_sort Anthin, Alexander
title No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity
title_short No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity
title_full No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity
title_fullStr No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity
title_full_unstemmed No Paris, No Impressionists : How Place Affects Collaborative Creativity
title_sort no paris, no impressionists : how place affects collaborative creativity
publisher Uppsala universitet, Sociologiska institutionen
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-305926
work_keys_str_mv AT anthinalexander noparisnoimpressionistshowplaceaffectscollaborativecreativity
_version_ 1718390587818770432