Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research

Knowledge matters in politics and a wide range of factors influence politicians’ use of research. One element that has been identified as relevant is the media. However, this has mainly been a theoretical conclusion, in want of empirical underpinning. In this thesis the topic is examined intensively...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mankler, Anders
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Uppsala universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-264945
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-264945
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-2649452018-01-11T05:12:43ZProfessors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to researchengMankler, AndersUppsala universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen2015knowledge usemediaearned income tax creditsurplus goalSwedenmechanismsPolitical Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)Knowledge matters in politics and a wide range of factors influence politicians’ use of research. One element that has been identified as relevant is the media. However, this has mainly been a theoretical conclusion, in want of empirical underpinning. In this thesis the topic is examined intensively through a quasi-experimental comparison and a mechanism tracing. The cases in focus are the Swedish earned income tax credit and surplus goal, and the concrete hypotheses concern whether the intensity and cohesion of the media coverage of research influence politicians' references to knowledge in debates. The results of the comparison suggest that there is a correlation between the intensity of the media coverage and the use of references in debates, whereas it is harder to say anything about the cohesion. Furthermore, a series of mechanisms explaining the relationship in detail are proposed. Among these is one indicating that vote maximi-sation encourages alignment of knowledge use with the media coverage, and another illuminating the practice of cherry-picking research results that are mentioned in the press. The conclusions thus not only tell us something about how the media influences knowledge use, but also advance the debate on symbolic knowledge use among politicians. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-264945application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic knowledge use
media
earned income tax credit
surplus goal
Sweden
mechanisms
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
spellingShingle knowledge use
media
earned income tax credit
surplus goal
Sweden
mechanisms
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Mankler, Anders
Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research
description Knowledge matters in politics and a wide range of factors influence politicians’ use of research. One element that has been identified as relevant is the media. However, this has mainly been a theoretical conclusion, in want of empirical underpinning. In this thesis the topic is examined intensively through a quasi-experimental comparison and a mechanism tracing. The cases in focus are the Swedish earned income tax credit and surplus goal, and the concrete hypotheses concern whether the intensity and cohesion of the media coverage of research influence politicians' references to knowledge in debates. The results of the comparison suggest that there is a correlation between the intensity of the media coverage and the use of references in debates, whereas it is harder to say anything about the cohesion. Furthermore, a series of mechanisms explaining the relationship in detail are proposed. Among these is one indicating that vote maximi-sation encourages alignment of knowledge use with the media coverage, and another illuminating the practice of cherry-picking research results that are mentioned in the press. The conclusions thus not only tell us something about how the media influences knowledge use, but also advance the debate on symbolic knowledge use among politicians.
author Mankler, Anders
author_facet Mankler, Anders
author_sort Mankler, Anders
title Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research
title_short Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research
title_full Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research
title_fullStr Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research
title_full_unstemmed Professors, papers and parliaments : How the media affects politicians’ references to research
title_sort professors, papers and parliaments : how the media affects politicians’ references to research
publisher Uppsala universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
publishDate 2015
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-264945
work_keys_str_mv AT mankleranders professorspapersandparliamentshowthemediaaffectspoliticiansreferencestoresearch
_version_ 1718605038877671424