Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC

In this two years masters thesis in Library and Information Studies, the Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification (LBC/BBK) and the Chinese Library Classification (CLC) are analyzed with regard to their historical and ideological backgrounds and their respective evolutions. The structure of th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lopez Ortega, Ruben
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-201081
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-201081
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-2010812014-02-11T04:50:35ZRyssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDCsweLopez Ortega, RubenUppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM2013Klassifikation (bibliotek) -- RysslandKlassifikation (bibliotek) -- KinaDewey decimalklassifikationRyssland -- SovjetunionenKinaPolitik - HistoriaIn this two years masters thesis in Library and Information Studies, the Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification (LBC/BBK) and the Chinese Library Classification (CLC) are analyzed with regard to their historical and ideological backgrounds and their respective evolutions. The structure of these classifications is compared with the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), as well as three chosen subjects (History, Politics and Religion). A qualitative comparative textual method is used.The study shows that these classification schemes, created at different times, different parts of the world, and different political systems, have different biases but give priority to the European before other foreign views. Otherwise, they often use a proximity principle. The CLC and the LBC were originally based on Marxist materialist principles but built in totally different ways. The CLC is closer to the DDC in the idealistic outline of the main groups of classes. The Chinese scheme, influenced by Maoism, shows the clearest ideological purpose, while the current LBC shows less bias than the others in the studied subjects. The dramatic political changes that Russia experienced after the fall of the Soviet Union necessitated the renewal of the scheme, which was not the case with the other two schemes. Despite this, the original structure of the LBC and also the Chinese Library Classification has been, with a few exceptions, retained, but the subdivisions have changed much more substantially. The LBC has lost its original Marxist content and the CLC has followed the regimes official guidelines which do not really acknowledge the major changes in Chinese society over the last few decades properly. History can explain many aspects of library classification schemes. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-201081Local 599Uppsatser inom biblioteks- & informationsvetenskap, 1650-4267 ; 599application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Klassifikation (bibliotek) -- Ryssland
Klassifikation (bibliotek) -- Kina
Dewey decimalklassifikation
Ryssland -- Sovjetunionen
Kina
Politik - Historia
spellingShingle Klassifikation (bibliotek) -- Ryssland
Klassifikation (bibliotek) -- Kina
Dewey decimalklassifikation
Ryssland -- Sovjetunionen
Kina
Politik - Historia
Lopez Ortega, Ruben
Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC
description In this two years masters thesis in Library and Information Studies, the Russian Library-Bibliographical Classification (LBC/BBK) and the Chinese Library Classification (CLC) are analyzed with regard to their historical and ideological backgrounds and their respective evolutions. The structure of these classifications is compared with the Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC), as well as three chosen subjects (History, Politics and Religion). A qualitative comparative textual method is used.The study shows that these classification schemes, created at different times, different parts of the world, and different political systems, have different biases but give priority to the European before other foreign views. Otherwise, they often use a proximity principle. The CLC and the LBC were originally based on Marxist materialist principles but built in totally different ways. The CLC is closer to the DDC in the idealistic outline of the main groups of classes. The Chinese scheme, influenced by Maoism, shows the clearest ideological purpose, while the current LBC shows less bias than the others in the studied subjects. The dramatic political changes that Russia experienced after the fall of the Soviet Union necessitated the renewal of the scheme, which was not the case with the other two schemes. Despite this, the original structure of the LBC and also the Chinese Library Classification has been, with a few exceptions, retained, but the subdivisions have changed much more substantially. The LBC has lost its original Marxist content and the CLC has followed the regimes official guidelines which do not really acknowledge the major changes in Chinese society over the last few decades properly. History can explain many aspects of library classification schemes.
author Lopez Ortega, Ruben
author_facet Lopez Ortega, Ruben
author_sort Lopez Ortega, Ruben
title Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC
title_short Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC
title_full Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC
title_fullStr Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC
title_full_unstemmed Ryssland, Kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : En komparativ analys av BBK och CLC med DDC
title_sort ryssland, kina och deras nationella klassifikationssystem : en komparativ analys av bbk och clc med ddc
publisher Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM
publishDate 2013
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-201081
work_keys_str_mv AT lopezortegaruben rysslandkinaochderasnationellaklassifikationssystemenkomparativanalysavbbkochclcmedddc
_version_ 1716637129655713792