Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv

The Gift 2.0 - A Museological Study of donations of Objects and its Underlying Motives, is a study in order to explain why people choose to donate items for museums, rather than any other alternative.The empirical study consists of qualitative, semi-structured research-interviews conducted with seve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fjellström, Daniel
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-158107
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-158107
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-uu-1581072016-07-15T05:14:12ZGåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motivsweFjellström, DanielUppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM2011GiftDonationInalienable PossessionHabitusCapitalFieldGåvadonationoförytterlig egendomhabituskapitalfältHistory and philosophy subjectsHistorisk-filosofiska ämnenThe Gift 2.0 - A Museological Study of donations of Objects and its Underlying Motives, is a study in order to explain why people choose to donate items for museums, rather than any other alternative.The empirical study consists of qualitative, semi-structured research-interviews conducted with seven selected curators from various museums, with extensive experience of the subject acquisition. I have chosen to only examine Swedish cultural-historical museums. The hypothesis that I assumed was first and foremost that the heritage sphere is what Pierre Bourdieu calls a field. The reason that people would donate objects to museums, is that the donation itself brings cultural capital to the donor, from people with the same habitus. Since I felt that Bourdieus theory of field, capital and habitus could not explain all the reason why people donate items to museum, my second hypotheses was that certain objects are what Annette Weiner called inalienable possessions, objects that at any cost may not be sold or bartered away. It is precisely the ability to keep the object outside of the commercial sphere that is the essential for an inalienable possession. Linked to this hypothesis I argued that museums act like a bastion of inalienable possessions, in which the donor can continue to keep the object while it has been given. My source material consists of the research interviews and secondary material that I have acquired during the study, consisting of literature, deed of gift and e-mail correspondence. I have analyzed both primary and secondary source material using my hypotheses. The results of this study verify that my hypothesis is valid to use as a musicological theory of gifts. The study is a two year master´s thesis in Museum and Heritage Studies.   Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-158107Local 9Uppsatser inom musei- & kulturarvsvetenskap, 1651-6079 ; 9application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Gift
Donation
Inalienable Possession
Habitus
Capital
Field
Gåva
donation
oförytterlig egendom
habitus
kapital
fält
History and philosophy subjects
Historisk-filosofiska ämnen
spellingShingle Gift
Donation
Inalienable Possession
Habitus
Capital
Field
Gåva
donation
oförytterlig egendom
habitus
kapital
fält
History and philosophy subjects
Historisk-filosofiska ämnen
Fjellström, Daniel
Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
description The Gift 2.0 - A Museological Study of donations of Objects and its Underlying Motives, is a study in order to explain why people choose to donate items for museums, rather than any other alternative.The empirical study consists of qualitative, semi-structured research-interviews conducted with seven selected curators from various museums, with extensive experience of the subject acquisition. I have chosen to only examine Swedish cultural-historical museums. The hypothesis that I assumed was first and foremost that the heritage sphere is what Pierre Bourdieu calls a field. The reason that people would donate objects to museums, is that the donation itself brings cultural capital to the donor, from people with the same habitus. Since I felt that Bourdieus theory of field, capital and habitus could not explain all the reason why people donate items to museum, my second hypotheses was that certain objects are what Annette Weiner called inalienable possessions, objects that at any cost may not be sold or bartered away. It is precisely the ability to keep the object outside of the commercial sphere that is the essential for an inalienable possession. Linked to this hypothesis I argued that museums act like a bastion of inalienable possessions, in which the donor can continue to keep the object while it has been given. My source material consists of the research interviews and secondary material that I have acquired during the study, consisting of literature, deed of gift and e-mail correspondence. I have analyzed both primary and secondary source material using my hypotheses. The results of this study verify that my hypothesis is valid to use as a musicological theory of gifts. The study is a two year master´s thesis in Museum and Heritage Studies.  
author Fjellström, Daniel
author_facet Fjellström, Daniel
author_sort Fjellström, Daniel
title Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
title_short Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
title_full Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
title_fullStr Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
title_full_unstemmed Gåvan 2.0 : En museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
title_sort gåvan 2.0 : en museologisk studie av förmålsdonationer och dess bakomliggande motiv
publisher Uppsala universitet, Institutionen för ABM
publishDate 2011
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-158107
work_keys_str_mv AT fjellstromdaniel gavan20enmuseologiskstudieavformalsdonationerochdessbakomliggandemotiv
_version_ 1718350560635125760