Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer

Violent islamistic extremism has together with violent right-wing extremism been marked as the highest probable threat for potential terrorist attacks in Sweden. Research within violent extremism has shown a certain level of consensus around what factors drive radicalization. A consensus about theor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Fransson, Johan
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186459
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-186459
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-1864592021-08-03T09:28:36ZMellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorersweFransson, JohanUmeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen2021Social Identity Theoryviolent Islamic extremismextremism ideologyidentity and ideologyPolitical ScienceStatsvetenskapViolent islamistic extremism has together with violent right-wing extremism been marked as the highest probable threat for potential terrorist attacks in Sweden. Research within violent extremism has shown a certain level of consensus around what factors drive radicalization. A consensus about theories or models that most adeptly explain its causation is however not prevalent within the academic community. This paper presents a model based on conclusions drawn from the Social Identity Theory (SIT) and will test this model's relevance by analyzing empirical data from interviews made with five practicing Muslims. The interviewees' attempts to explain factors of radicalization have been analyzed by being compartmentalized into an ideological- or identity-based continuum. Factors of radicalization able to be explained by the SIT-model have been categorized as identity-based explanations, whereas factors depending on knowledge, ideology, or religion have been categorized as ideology-based explanations. Most of the experienced factors could be explained by the SIT-model, while only some of two interviewees` experiences could be categorized as ideology-based. The significance of the empirical data from this research and its implications will be presented in the chapter of discussion along with previous research and its theoretical framework; recommendations for de-radicalization and continued research will be given at the end. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186459application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Social Identity Theory
violent Islamic extremism
extremism ideology
identity and ideology
Political Science
Statsvetenskap
spellingShingle Social Identity Theory
violent Islamic extremism
extremism ideology
identity and ideology
Political Science
Statsvetenskap
Fransson, Johan
Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
description Violent islamistic extremism has together with violent right-wing extremism been marked as the highest probable threat for potential terrorist attacks in Sweden. Research within violent extremism has shown a certain level of consensus around what factors drive radicalization. A consensus about theories or models that most adeptly explain its causation is however not prevalent within the academic community. This paper presents a model based on conclusions drawn from the Social Identity Theory (SIT) and will test this model's relevance by analyzing empirical data from interviews made with five practicing Muslims. The interviewees' attempts to explain factors of radicalization have been analyzed by being compartmentalized into an ideological- or identity-based continuum. Factors of radicalization able to be explained by the SIT-model have been categorized as identity-based explanations, whereas factors depending on knowledge, ideology, or religion have been categorized as ideology-based explanations. Most of the experienced factors could be explained by the SIT-model, while only some of two interviewees` experiences could be categorized as ideology-based. The significance of the empirical data from this research and its implications will be presented in the chapter of discussion along with previous research and its theoretical framework; recommendations for de-radicalization and continued research will be given at the end.
author Fransson, Johan
author_facet Fransson, Johan
author_sort Fransson, Johan
title Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
title_short Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
title_full Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
title_fullStr Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
title_full_unstemmed Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
title_sort mellan identitet och ideologi : hur socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
publisher Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
publishDate 2021
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186459
work_keys_str_mv AT franssonjohan mellanidentitetochideologihursocialidentitetsteorinkananalyseramuslimersforklaringaravradikaliseringsfaktorer
_version_ 1719458671590637568