Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer
Violent islamistic extremism has together with violent right-wing extremism been marked as the highest probable threat for potential terrorist attacks in Sweden. Research within violent extremism has shown a certain level of consensus around what factors drive radicalization. A consensus about theor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | Swedish |
Published: |
Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186459 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-186459 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-1864592021-08-03T09:28:36ZMellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorersweFransson, JohanUmeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen2021Social Identity Theoryviolent Islamic extremismextremism ideologyidentity and ideologyPolitical ScienceStatsvetenskapViolent islamistic extremism has together with violent right-wing extremism been marked as the highest probable threat for potential terrorist attacks in Sweden. Research within violent extremism has shown a certain level of consensus around what factors drive radicalization. A consensus about theories or models that most adeptly explain its causation is however not prevalent within the academic community. This paper presents a model based on conclusions drawn from the Social Identity Theory (SIT) and will test this model's relevance by analyzing empirical data from interviews made with five practicing Muslims. The interviewees' attempts to explain factors of radicalization have been analyzed by being compartmentalized into an ideological- or identity-based continuum. Factors of radicalization able to be explained by the SIT-model have been categorized as identity-based explanations, whereas factors depending on knowledge, ideology, or religion have been categorized as ideology-based explanations. Most of the experienced factors could be explained by the SIT-model, while only some of two interviewees` experiences could be categorized as ideology-based. The significance of the empirical data from this research and its implications will be presented in the chapter of discussion along with previous research and its theoretical framework; recommendations for de-radicalization and continued research will be given at the end. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186459application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
Swedish |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Social Identity Theory violent Islamic extremism extremism ideology identity and ideology Political Science Statsvetenskap |
spellingShingle |
Social Identity Theory violent Islamic extremism extremism ideology identity and ideology Political Science Statsvetenskap Fransson, Johan Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
description |
Violent islamistic extremism has together with violent right-wing extremism been marked as the highest probable threat for potential terrorist attacks in Sweden. Research within violent extremism has shown a certain level of consensus around what factors drive radicalization. A consensus about theories or models that most adeptly explain its causation is however not prevalent within the academic community. This paper presents a model based on conclusions drawn from the Social Identity Theory (SIT) and will test this model's relevance by analyzing empirical data from interviews made with five practicing Muslims. The interviewees' attempts to explain factors of radicalization have been analyzed by being compartmentalized into an ideological- or identity-based continuum. Factors of radicalization able to be explained by the SIT-model have been categorized as identity-based explanations, whereas factors depending on knowledge, ideology, or religion have been categorized as ideology-based explanations. Most of the experienced factors could be explained by the SIT-model, while only some of two interviewees` experiences could be categorized as ideology-based. The significance of the empirical data from this research and its implications will be presented in the chapter of discussion along with previous research and its theoretical framework; recommendations for de-radicalization and continued research will be given at the end. |
author |
Fransson, Johan |
author_facet |
Fransson, Johan |
author_sort |
Fransson, Johan |
title |
Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
title_short |
Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
title_full |
Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
title_fullStr |
Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
title_full_unstemmed |
Mellan identitet och ideologi : Hur Socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
title_sort |
mellan identitet och ideologi : hur socialidentitetsteorin kan analysera muslimers förklaringar av radikaliseringsfaktorer |
publisher |
Umeå universitet, Statsvetenskapliga institutionen |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-186459 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT franssonjohan mellanidentitetochideologihursocialidentitetsteorinkananalyseramuslimersforklaringaravradikaliseringsfaktorer |
_version_ |
1719458671590637568 |