Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor

A science journalist has to depend on its sources during the working processes, as well as keeping a neutral stand in the matter. Therefore a journalists stand point during the research process is venerable and will determine the outcome of the study. With todays easy access to news thru smartphones...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Johansson, Anna-Stina
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Umeå universitet, Institutionen för kultur- och medievetenskaper 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-137298
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-137298
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-umu-1372982017-06-30T06:01:39ZMötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källorsweThe meeting between the journalist and the sience : A qualitative case study on scientific journalists' work on scientific sources.Johansson, Anna-StinaUmeå universitet, Institutionen för kultur- och medievetenskaper2017JournalismjournalistsourceMedia and CommunicationsMedie- och kommunikationsvetenskapA science journalist has to depend on its sources during the working processes, as well as keeping a neutral stand in the matter. Therefore a journalists stand point during the research process is venerable and will determine the outcome of the study. With todays easy access to news thru smartphones, computers and a daly newsfeed, we need to know we can depend on journalists referring to scientific sources. Consequently the objective of this study is to view how science journalists reason around a scholarly source of interest, also in what ways they work with these sources in terms of staying close to the truth. This study will also compare the way journalists look at the working process, with the actual work practice of scientific sources. A qualitative case study was used, data has been collected by qualitative interviews and analysed with thematic analysis. Also theories about agenda setting, gatekeppers, valuation of news and theories of influence took place to help capture how scientific sources are used in a journalists working process.  This study shows that there is an ensemble between the journalists and what scientific sources they use, furthermore it shows that a journalists neutral view is a very crucial part of the working processes. It often happens to be a lead, who later breaks into news and on the way it lost its credibility, even though the journalist clams to use science as a prime source. Later in the interpretation it becomes clear that a journalist perspective on how a source should be used, often don’t cooperate with how its done in reality. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-137298application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Journalism
journalist
source
Media and Communications
Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap
spellingShingle Journalism
journalist
source
Media and Communications
Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap
Johansson, Anna-Stina
Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
description A science journalist has to depend on its sources during the working processes, as well as keeping a neutral stand in the matter. Therefore a journalists stand point during the research process is venerable and will determine the outcome of the study. With todays easy access to news thru smartphones, computers and a daly newsfeed, we need to know we can depend on journalists referring to scientific sources. Consequently the objective of this study is to view how science journalists reason around a scholarly source of interest, also in what ways they work with these sources in terms of staying close to the truth. This study will also compare the way journalists look at the working process, with the actual work practice of scientific sources. A qualitative case study was used, data has been collected by qualitative interviews and analysed with thematic analysis. Also theories about agenda setting, gatekeppers, valuation of news and theories of influence took place to help capture how scientific sources are used in a journalists working process.  This study shows that there is an ensemble between the journalists and what scientific sources they use, furthermore it shows that a journalists neutral view is a very crucial part of the working processes. It often happens to be a lead, who later breaks into news and on the way it lost its credibility, even though the journalist clams to use science as a prime source. Later in the interpretation it becomes clear that a journalist perspective on how a source should be used, often don’t cooperate with how its done in reality.
author Johansson, Anna-Stina
author_facet Johansson, Anna-Stina
author_sort Johansson, Anna-Stina
title Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
title_short Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
title_full Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
title_fullStr Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
title_full_unstemmed Mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : En kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
title_sort mötet mellan journalisten och vetenskapen : en kvalitativ fallstudie om vetenskapsjournalisters arbete med vetenskapliga källor
publisher Umeå universitet, Institutionen för kultur- och medievetenskaper
publishDate 2017
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-137298
work_keys_str_mv AT johanssonannastina motetmellanjournalistenochvetenskapenenkvalitativfallstudieomvetenskapsjournalistersarbetemedvetenskapligakallor
AT johanssonannastina themeetingbetweenthejournalistandthesienceaqualitativecasestudyonscientificjournalistsworkonscientificsources
_version_ 1718484267625873408