A Natural Interpretation of Classical Proofs
In this thesis we use the syntactic-semantic method of constructive type theory to give meaning to classical logic, in particular Gentzen's LK. We interpret a derivation of a classical sequent as a derivation of a contradiction from the assumptions that the antecedent formulas are true and that...
Main Author: | Brage, Jens |
---|---|
Format: | Doctoral Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Stockholms universitet, Matematiska institutionen
2006
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-913 http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:91-7155-206-5 |
Similar Items
-
Proof Compression and NP Versus PSPACE II
by: Lew Gordeev, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
Deep Inference and Symmetry in Classical Proofs
by: Brünnler, Kai
Published: (2003) -
Proof-search in hybrid logic
by: Daiva Aleknavičiūtė, et al.
Published: (2008-12-01) -
Partial cut elimination for combinations of propositional multi-modal logics with past time
by: Jūratė Sakalauskaitė
Published: (2011-12-01) -
Cut free sequent calculus for logic S5n(ED)
by: Haroldas Giedra
Published: (2010-12-01)