"Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States

Anchored theoretically in critical discourse analysis and by using analytical tools from legitimization theory, this essay explores the communication within one particular kind of anti-abortion activism, called sidewalk counseling. Informed by previous research on abortion discourse, this study crit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lidström, Moa
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189563
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-189563
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-1895632021-01-26T05:35:03Z"Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United StatesengLidström, MoaStockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen2020Critical discourse analysislegitimizationabortion discoursesidewalk counselingGeneral Language Studies and LinguisticsJämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistikSpecific LanguagesStudier av enskilda språkAnchored theoretically in critical discourse analysis and by using analytical tools from legitimization theory, this essay explores the communication within one particular kind of anti-abortion activism, called sidewalk counseling. Informed by previous research on abortion discourse, this study critically analyzes transcribed, authentic video material and accounts for legitimization strategies employed in sidewalk counselor language. The aims of this study are to investigate the linguistic make-up of sidewalk counselor communication, as well as how or to what extent sidewalk counselors motivate their activism in their speech, and to explore potential power relations in the communication. The results show that sidewalk counselors use a number of legitimization strategies in their communication, and they also indicate a power structure based in religiousness. Key findings include that appealing to interlocutors’ emotions is the most commonly used strategy by sidewalk counselors in the examined conversations, while referring to a hypothetical future is the least used strategy. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189563application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Critical discourse analysis
legitimization
abortion discourse
sidewalk counseling
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik
Specific Languages
Studier av enskilda språk
spellingShingle Critical discourse analysis
legitimization
abortion discourse
sidewalk counseling
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik
Specific Languages
Studier av enskilda språk
Lidström, Moa
"Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States
description Anchored theoretically in critical discourse analysis and by using analytical tools from legitimization theory, this essay explores the communication within one particular kind of anti-abortion activism, called sidewalk counseling. Informed by previous research on abortion discourse, this study critically analyzes transcribed, authentic video material and accounts for legitimization strategies employed in sidewalk counselor language. The aims of this study are to investigate the linguistic make-up of sidewalk counselor communication, as well as how or to what extent sidewalk counselors motivate their activism in their speech, and to explore potential power relations in the communication. The results show that sidewalk counselors use a number of legitimization strategies in their communication, and they also indicate a power structure based in religiousness. Key findings include that appealing to interlocutors’ emotions is the most commonly used strategy by sidewalk counselors in the examined conversations, while referring to a hypothetical future is the least used strategy.
author Lidström, Moa
author_facet Lidström, Moa
author_sort Lidström, Moa
title "Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States
title_short "Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States
title_full "Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States
title_fullStr "Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States
title_full_unstemmed "Just Because It's Legal Doesn't Make It Moral" : A Critical Discourse Analysis of Communication in the Anti-Abortionist Activism of Sidewalk Counseling in the United States
title_sort "just because it's legal doesn't make it moral" : a critical discourse analysis of communication in the anti-abortionist activism of sidewalk counseling in the united states
publisher Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen
publishDate 2020
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-189563
work_keys_str_mv AT lidstrommoa justbecauseitslegaldoesntmakeitmoralacriticaldiscourseanalysisofcommunicationintheantiabortionistactivismofsidewalkcounselingintheunitedstates
_version_ 1719374224230973440