Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?

During the 12th to the 16th century the Scandinavian region went through a cultural change, from Germanic to Latin culture. This change effected a wide variety of areas for example law, piety, clothing, religion and system of writing. It is the change in the system of writing this essay will examine...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lannebjer, Martin
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Stockholms universitet, Centrum för medeltidsstudier 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-149675
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-149675
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-1496752017-12-09T05:30:04ZMedeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?sweLannebjer, MartinStockholms universitet, Centrum för medeltidsstudierStockholms universitet, Historiska institutionen2017Kulturell teoriliteracyrunliteracykulturell förändringmedeltidnorden.Humanities and the ArtsHumaniora och konstDuring the 12th to the 16th century the Scandinavian region went through a cultural change, from Germanic to Latin culture. This change effected a wide variety of areas for example law, piety, clothing, religion and system of writing. It is the change in the system of writing this essay will examine i.e. the change from runes to the Latin alphabet. The medieval runic Europe (including the Nordic countries and the north Atlantic islands) has a great variety in their numbers of runic material but in total there is about 2800 of them. Most are from the Scandinavian countries Sweden and Norway. The runic alphabet and the Latin alphabet coexisted during the Nordic Middle ages but the Latin alphabet became dominant over time.The runic alphabet changed during the 11th and 12th centuries from 16 runes to 28 (as many letters as the Latin alphabet) and was in continues use during the whole time period. The question is why it survived for so long? How come the runic alphabet did not die out sooner given the introduction of the Latin alphabet and the influence from Latin countries (i.e. Western Europe)? Earlier research has largely focused on the Viking age carvings and has not problematized the change from an historical point of view or from a cultural perspective. This essays goal is to explain that change by categorizing the inscriptions according to their theme and content in order to identify runic usage as a cultural belonging, be it a passive or active choice. I will also discuss the literacy level (or to be precis the runeliteracy) of the Scandinavian countries. Who could read the runes and in what context where they used? Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-149675application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Kulturell teori
literacy
runliteracy
kulturell förändring
medeltid
norden.
Humanities and the Arts
Humaniora och konst
spellingShingle Kulturell teori
literacy
runliteracy
kulturell förändring
medeltid
norden.
Humanities and the Arts
Humaniora och konst
Lannebjer, Martin
Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
description During the 12th to the 16th century the Scandinavian region went through a cultural change, from Germanic to Latin culture. This change effected a wide variety of areas for example law, piety, clothing, religion and system of writing. It is the change in the system of writing this essay will examine i.e. the change from runes to the Latin alphabet. The medieval runic Europe (including the Nordic countries and the north Atlantic islands) has a great variety in their numbers of runic material but in total there is about 2800 of them. Most are from the Scandinavian countries Sweden and Norway. The runic alphabet and the Latin alphabet coexisted during the Nordic Middle ages but the Latin alphabet became dominant over time.The runic alphabet changed during the 11th and 12th centuries from 16 runes to 28 (as many letters as the Latin alphabet) and was in continues use during the whole time period. The question is why it survived for so long? How come the runic alphabet did not die out sooner given the introduction of the Latin alphabet and the influence from Latin countries (i.e. Western Europe)? Earlier research has largely focused on the Viking age carvings and has not problematized the change from an historical point of view or from a cultural perspective. This essays goal is to explain that change by categorizing the inscriptions according to their theme and content in order to identify runic usage as a cultural belonging, be it a passive or active choice. I will also discuss the literacy level (or to be precis the runeliteracy) of the Scandinavian countries. Who could read the runes and in what context where they used?
author Lannebjer, Martin
author_facet Lannebjer, Martin
author_sort Lannebjer, Martin
title Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
title_short Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
title_full Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
title_fullStr Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
title_full_unstemmed Medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
title_sort medeltida runor och runliteracy : kulturell krock eller kompromiss?
publisher Stockholms universitet, Centrum för medeltidsstudier
publishDate 2017
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-149675
work_keys_str_mv AT lannebjermartin medeltidarunorochrunliteracykulturellkrockellerkompromiss
_version_ 1718563891806470144