Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition

Automaticity (in this essay defined as short response time) and fluency in language use are closely connected to each other and some research has been conducted regarding some of the aspects involved. In fact, the notion of automaticity is still debated and many definitions and opinions on what auto...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonsson, Signe
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-130831
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-130831
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-1308312018-01-11T05:11:58ZAutomaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognitionengJonsson, SigneStockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen2016Vocabulary proficiencyResponse timeAutomaticityEnglishSecond Language AcquisitionPaul NationFrequency levelsCoefficient of Variation.Specific LanguagesStudier av enskilda språkAutomaticity (in this essay defined as short response time) and fluency in language use are closely connected to each other and some research has been conducted regarding some of the aspects involved. In fact, the notion of automaticity is still debated and many definitions and opinions on what automaticity is have been suggested (Andersson,1987, 1992, 1993, Logan, 1988, Segalowitz, 2010). One aspect that still needs more research is the correlation between vocabulary proficiency (a person’s knowledge about words and ability to use them correctly) and response time in word recognition. Therefore, the aim of this study has been to investigate this correlation using two different tests; one vocabulary size test (Paul Nation) and one lexical decision task (SuperLab) that measures both response time and accuracy. 23 Swedish students partaking in the English 7 course in upper secondary Swedish school were tested. The data were analyzed using a quantitative method where the average values and correlations from the test were used to compare the results. The correlations were calculated using Pearson’s Coefficient Correlations Calculator. The empirical study indicates that vocabulary proficiency is not strongly correlated with shorter response times in word recognition. Rather, the data indicate that L2 learners instead are sensitive to the frequency levels of the vocabulary. The accuracy (number of correct recognized words) and response times correlate with the frequency level of the tested words. This indicates that factors other than vocabulary proficiency are important for the ability to recognize words quickly. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-130831application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Vocabulary proficiency
Response time
Automaticity
English
Second Language Acquisition
Paul Nation
Frequency levels
Coefficient of Variation.
Specific Languages
Studier av enskilda språk
spellingShingle Vocabulary proficiency
Response time
Automaticity
English
Second Language Acquisition
Paul Nation
Frequency levels
Coefficient of Variation.
Specific Languages
Studier av enskilda språk
Jonsson, Signe
Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
description Automaticity (in this essay defined as short response time) and fluency in language use are closely connected to each other and some research has been conducted regarding some of the aspects involved. In fact, the notion of automaticity is still debated and many definitions and opinions on what automaticity is have been suggested (Andersson,1987, 1992, 1993, Logan, 1988, Segalowitz, 2010). One aspect that still needs more research is the correlation between vocabulary proficiency (a person’s knowledge about words and ability to use them correctly) and response time in word recognition. Therefore, the aim of this study has been to investigate this correlation using two different tests; one vocabulary size test (Paul Nation) and one lexical decision task (SuperLab) that measures both response time and accuracy. 23 Swedish students partaking in the English 7 course in upper secondary Swedish school were tested. The data were analyzed using a quantitative method where the average values and correlations from the test were used to compare the results. The correlations were calculated using Pearson’s Coefficient Correlations Calculator. The empirical study indicates that vocabulary proficiency is not strongly correlated with shorter response times in word recognition. Rather, the data indicate that L2 learners instead are sensitive to the frequency levels of the vocabulary. The accuracy (number of correct recognized words) and response times correlate with the frequency level of the tested words. This indicates that factors other than vocabulary proficiency are important for the ability to recognize words quickly.
author Jonsson, Signe
author_facet Jonsson, Signe
author_sort Jonsson, Signe
title Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
title_short Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
title_full Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
title_fullStr Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
title_full_unstemmed Automaticity in L2 learning: Correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
title_sort automaticity in l2 learning: correlation between vocabulary proficiency and response time in word recognition
publisher Stockholms universitet, Engelska institutionen
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-130831
work_keys_str_mv AT jonssonsigne automaticityinl2learningcorrelationbetweenvocabularyproficiencyandresponsetimeinwordrecognition
_version_ 1718604523372544000