Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town

This Master thesis is written in the field of collaborative planning aiming to challenge the collaborative approach on it applicability, especially in the context of the Global South. As a case study it looks on the urban poor community participatory practice, the so called 're-blocking' i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Heyer, Antje
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Stockholms universitet, Kulturgeografiska institutionen 2015
Subjects:
SDI
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-124485
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-124485
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-1244852016-01-14T04:52:29ZOpportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape TownengHeyer, AntjeStockholms universitet, Kulturgeografiska institutionen2015re-blockingcollaborative planninginsitu informal settlement upgradingurban poor communitiesinclusive citiesSouth AfricaSDIUpgrading Informal Settlements Programme (UISP)This Master thesis is written in the field of collaborative planning aiming to challenge the collaborative approach on it applicability, especially in the context of the Global South. As a case study it looks on the urban poor community participatory practice, the so called 're-blocking' in Cape Town – an example of insitu informal settlement upgrading. It questions not only to what extent re-blocking displays a successful approach of collaborative planing but also whether it can lead to more inclusive cities in South Africa. The field data was gained through qualitative semi-structured interviews, observations and an analysis of national housing policy documents. The findings evaluate re-blocking as a successful example of collaborative planning in the sense that local communities are truly involved in the process and have a lot of decision making power. Also, re- blocking can be replicable to other cities in South Africa. Yet it faces several risks in community mobilisation and communication and can only be operated on a small scale. Therefore, the thesis concludes that re-blocking itself may not lead to inclusive cities, however as an example of community participation it may change the mindset of the South African society and (local) government towards informal community inclusion.  Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-124485application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic re-blocking
collaborative planning
insitu informal settlement upgrading
urban poor communities
inclusive cities
South Africa
SDI
Upgrading Informal Settlements Programme (UISP)
spellingShingle re-blocking
collaborative planning
insitu informal settlement upgrading
urban poor communities
inclusive cities
South Africa
SDI
Upgrading Informal Settlements Programme (UISP)
Heyer, Antje
Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
description This Master thesis is written in the field of collaborative planning aiming to challenge the collaborative approach on it applicability, especially in the context of the Global South. As a case study it looks on the urban poor community participatory practice, the so called 're-blocking' in Cape Town – an example of insitu informal settlement upgrading. It questions not only to what extent re-blocking displays a successful approach of collaborative planing but also whether it can lead to more inclusive cities in South Africa. The field data was gained through qualitative semi-structured interviews, observations and an analysis of national housing policy documents. The findings evaluate re-blocking as a successful example of collaborative planning in the sense that local communities are truly involved in the process and have a lot of decision making power. Also, re- blocking can be replicable to other cities in South Africa. Yet it faces several risks in community mobilisation and communication and can only be operated on a small scale. Therefore, the thesis concludes that re-blocking itself may not lead to inclusive cities, however as an example of community participation it may change the mindset of the South African society and (local) government towards informal community inclusion. 
author Heyer, Antje
author_facet Heyer, Antje
author_sort Heyer, Antje
title Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
title_short Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
title_full Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
title_fullStr Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
title_full_unstemmed Opportunities for Collaborative Planning in South Africa? : An analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the South African SDI Alliance in Cape Town
title_sort opportunities for collaborative planning in south africa? : an analysis of the practice 're-blocking' by the south african sdi alliance in cape town
publisher Stockholms universitet, Kulturgeografiska institutionen
publishDate 2015
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-124485
work_keys_str_mv AT heyerantje opportunitiesforcollaborativeplanninginsouthafricaananalysisofthepracticereblockingbythesouthafricansdiallianceincapetown
_version_ 1718161083475165184