Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods
The aim of this study is to compare remote sensing methods in the context of a vegetation mapping of an urban environment. The methods used was (1) a traditional per-pixel based method; maximum likelihood supervised classification (ENVI), (2) a standard object based method; example based feature ext...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi
2015
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-117108 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-117108 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-su-1171082015-05-08T05:02:24ZUrban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of MethodsengPalm, FredrikStockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi2015Vegetation MappingWindow Independent Contextual Segmentation (WICS)Supervised ClassificationObject Based Image AnalysisThe aim of this study is to compare remote sensing methods in the context of a vegetation mapping of an urban environment. The methods used was (1) a traditional per-pixel based method; maximum likelihood supervised classification (ENVI), (2) a standard object based method; example based feature extraction (ENVI) and (3) a newly developed method; Window Independent Contextual Segmentation (WICS) (Choros Cognition). A four-band SPOT5 image with a pixel size of 10x10m was used for the classifications. A validation data-set was created using a ortho corrected aerial image with a pixel size of 1x1m. Error matrices was created by cross-tabulating the classified images with the validation data-set. From the error matrices, overall accuracy and kappa coefficient was calculated. The object-based method performed best with a overall accuracy of 80% and a kappa value of 0.6, followed by the WICS method with an overall accuracy of 77% and a kappa value of 0.53, placing the supervised classification last with an overall accuracy of 71% and a kappa value of 0.38. The results of this study suggests object-based method and WICS to perform better than the supervised classification in an urban environment. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-117108application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Vegetation Mapping Window Independent Contextual Segmentation (WICS) Supervised Classification Object Based Image Analysis |
spellingShingle |
Vegetation Mapping Window Independent Contextual Segmentation (WICS) Supervised Classification Object Based Image Analysis Palm, Fredrik Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods |
description |
The aim of this study is to compare remote sensing methods in the context of a vegetation mapping of an urban environment. The methods used was (1) a traditional per-pixel based method; maximum likelihood supervised classification (ENVI), (2) a standard object based method; example based feature extraction (ENVI) and (3) a newly developed method; Window Independent Contextual Segmentation (WICS) (Choros Cognition). A four-band SPOT5 image with a pixel size of 10x10m was used for the classifications. A validation data-set was created using a ortho corrected aerial image with a pixel size of 1x1m. Error matrices was created by cross-tabulating the classified images with the validation data-set. From the error matrices, overall accuracy and kappa coefficient was calculated. The object-based method performed best with a overall accuracy of 80% and a kappa value of 0.6, followed by the WICS method with an overall accuracy of 77% and a kappa value of 0.53, placing the supervised classification last with an overall accuracy of 71% and a kappa value of 0.38. The results of this study suggests object-based method and WICS to perform better than the supervised classification in an urban environment. |
author |
Palm, Fredrik |
author_facet |
Palm, Fredrik |
author_sort |
Palm, Fredrik |
title |
Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods |
title_short |
Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods |
title_full |
Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods |
title_fullStr |
Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods |
title_full_unstemmed |
Urban Vegetation Mapping Using Remote Sensing Techniques : A Comparison of Methods |
title_sort |
urban vegetation mapping using remote sensing techniques : a comparison of methods |
publisher |
Stockholms universitet, Institutionen för naturgeografi |
publishDate |
2015 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-117108 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT palmfredrik urbanvegetationmappingusingremotesensingtechniquesacomparisonofmethods |
_version_ |
1716803702324461568 |