Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar

The subject-matter of the following essay is to investigate the relationship between what is commonly called Deep Ecology or Biocentric Philosophy, as articulated by the co-founder of the Deep Ecology Movement, Arne Naess, and later proponents of the biocentric school of environmentalist thought. I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wigh, Christian
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och kommunikation 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-6403
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-6403
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-64032013-01-08T13:29:16ZMänniskan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningarsweWigh, ChristianSödertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och kommunikation2010Deep Ecologyantrophocentrismenvironmental ethicsArne NaessDave ForemanEarth First!Pentti LinkolaecofascismLuc FerryMurray Bookchin.History of science and ideasIdé- o lärdomshistoriaThe subject-matter of the following essay is to investigate the relationship between what is commonly called Deep Ecology or Biocentric Philosophy, as articulated by the co-founder of the Deep Ecology Movement, Arne Naess, and later proponents of the biocentric school of environmentalist thought. I contrast Naess’ concept of Self-realization as founded in his Ecosophy T to the ideas of american conservationist and co-founder of the radical green movement Earth First! Dave Foreman, and to the controversial finnish environmentalist and ecofascist Pentti Linkola’s ideological agenda of population-reduction respectively. According to some critics of the movement, especially the social ecologist Murray Bookchin and French liberal philosopher Luc Ferry, the Deep Ecology ideology is essentially misanthropic and totalitarian in structure. A central idea among deep ecologists is that ecosystems and natural entities have intrinsic value in themselves, even outside a human social context. This idea is thought of among deep ecologists to create a philosophically sound basis for counteracting the environmental global crisis. Both Bookchin and Ferry argue that this idea reduces the role of human reason and ethics in a fundamental way, especially in relation to questions concerning population-growth control. My aim is to show that the original intention of Arne Naess in his philosophy (Ekosofi T) does not resemble either Ferrys focus of critique, neither the controversial statements made by Dave Foreman and Earth First! nor Linkolas population-control agenda. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-6403application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Deep Ecology
antrophocentrism
environmental ethics
Arne Naess
Dave Foreman
Earth First!
Pentti Linkola
ecofascism
Luc Ferry
Murray Bookchin.
History of science and ideas
Idé- o lärdomshistoria
spellingShingle Deep Ecology
antrophocentrism
environmental ethics
Arne Naess
Dave Foreman
Earth First!
Pentti Linkola
ecofascism
Luc Ferry
Murray Bookchin.
History of science and ideas
Idé- o lärdomshistoria
Wigh, Christian
Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
description The subject-matter of the following essay is to investigate the relationship between what is commonly called Deep Ecology or Biocentric Philosophy, as articulated by the co-founder of the Deep Ecology Movement, Arne Naess, and later proponents of the biocentric school of environmentalist thought. I contrast Naess’ concept of Self-realization as founded in his Ecosophy T to the ideas of american conservationist and co-founder of the radical green movement Earth First! Dave Foreman, and to the controversial finnish environmentalist and ecofascist Pentti Linkola’s ideological agenda of population-reduction respectively. According to some critics of the movement, especially the social ecologist Murray Bookchin and French liberal philosopher Luc Ferry, the Deep Ecology ideology is essentially misanthropic and totalitarian in structure. A central idea among deep ecologists is that ecosystems and natural entities have intrinsic value in themselves, even outside a human social context. This idea is thought of among deep ecologists to create a philosophically sound basis for counteracting the environmental global crisis. Both Bookchin and Ferry argue that this idea reduces the role of human reason and ethics in a fundamental way, especially in relation to questions concerning population-growth control. My aim is to show that the original intention of Arne Naess in his philosophy (Ekosofi T) does not resemble either Ferrys focus of critique, neither the controversial statements made by Dave Foreman and Earth First! nor Linkolas population-control agenda.
author Wigh, Christian
author_facet Wigh, Christian
author_sort Wigh, Christian
title Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
title_short Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
title_full Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
title_fullStr Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
title_full_unstemmed Människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
title_sort människan i naturen : om etiska gränsdragningar och djupekologins kritik av antropocentriska naturuppfattningar
publisher Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och kommunikation
publishDate 2010
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-6403
work_keys_str_mv AT wighchristian manniskaninaturenometiskagransdragningarochdjupekologinskritikavantropocentriskanaturuppfattningar
_version_ 1716521841990828032