Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil

Mirja Unge is a Swedish author who often writes about young people and the tough situations they face. She writes both plays and short-stories and is acclaimed for her dialogue. The aim of this essay is to examine Unge’s dialogue style and how potential face-threatening situations are portrayed. To...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Torefeldt, Stina
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Södertörns högskola, Svenska 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40876
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-40876
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-408762020-06-10T04:24:26ZSamtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstilsweTo Talk Like Unge : A study of the dialogue style of the author Mirja UngeTorefeldt, StinaSödertörns högskola, Svenska2020UngeDet var igår baraMariellaConversation analysisDialogueFictionLiterary stylisticsTopicFace-threateningConversational supportUngeDet var igår baraMariellaSamtalsanalysDialogSkönlitteraturLitterär stilistikTopikAnsiktshotSamtalsstödSpecific LanguagesStudier av enskilda språkMirja Unge is a Swedish author who often writes about young people and the tough situations they face. She writes both plays and short-stories and is acclaimed for her dialogue. The aim of this essay is to examine Unge’s dialogue style and how potential face-threatening situations are portrayed. To reach my aim I pose questions regarding the conversational support in two of Unge’s literary works, the short story Det var igår bara and the play Mariella and compare the result. The dialogues analysed both tackle the sensitive subject of sexual assault, a topic that is potentially face-threatening. The analysis is based on the theoretical and methodical framework of conversation analysis. The conversational support is analysed through “keys” that unlock interesting points in the conversation. The keys in this essay are ‘topic generation’ and ‘topic shifts’. The results show that in the text with the most conversational support (the short story) the subject of assault is avoided and only appear in the characters thoughts. In the play on the other hand there is very little conversational support, but the character tells the whole story in a direct manner. This indicates that the situation in the short story is more face-threatening than in the play. However there are other aspects in the dialogue that makes the conversation difficult for the characters in both stories. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40876application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Unge
Det var igår bara
Mariella
Conversation analysis
Dialogue
Fiction
Literary stylistics
Topic
Face-threatening
Conversational support
Unge
Det var igår bara
Mariella
Samtalsanalys
Dialog
Skönlitteratur
Litterär stilistik
Topik
Ansiktshot
Samtalsstöd
Specific Languages
Studier av enskilda språk
spellingShingle Unge
Det var igår bara
Mariella
Conversation analysis
Dialogue
Fiction
Literary stylistics
Topic
Face-threatening
Conversational support
Unge
Det var igår bara
Mariella
Samtalsanalys
Dialog
Skönlitteratur
Litterär stilistik
Topik
Ansiktshot
Samtalsstöd
Specific Languages
Studier av enskilda språk
Torefeldt, Stina
Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil
description Mirja Unge is a Swedish author who often writes about young people and the tough situations they face. She writes both plays and short-stories and is acclaimed for her dialogue. The aim of this essay is to examine Unge’s dialogue style and how potential face-threatening situations are portrayed. To reach my aim I pose questions regarding the conversational support in two of Unge’s literary works, the short story Det var igår bara and the play Mariella and compare the result. The dialogues analysed both tackle the sensitive subject of sexual assault, a topic that is potentially face-threatening. The analysis is based on the theoretical and methodical framework of conversation analysis. The conversational support is analysed through “keys” that unlock interesting points in the conversation. The keys in this essay are ‘topic generation’ and ‘topic shifts’. The results show that in the text with the most conversational support (the short story) the subject of assault is avoided and only appear in the characters thoughts. In the play on the other hand there is very little conversational support, but the character tells the whole story in a direct manner. This indicates that the situation in the short story is more face-threatening than in the play. However there are other aspects in the dialogue that makes the conversation difficult for the characters in both stories.
author Torefeldt, Stina
author_facet Torefeldt, Stina
author_sort Torefeldt, Stina
title Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil
title_short Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil
title_full Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil
title_fullStr Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil
title_full_unstemmed Samtala som ung(e) : En samtalsanalytisk studie av Mirja Unges dialogstil
title_sort samtala som ung(e) : en samtalsanalytisk studie av mirja unges dialogstil
publisher Södertörns högskola, Svenska
publishDate 2020
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-40876
work_keys_str_mv AT torefeldtstina samtalasomungeensamtalsanalytiskstudieavmirjaungesdialogstil
AT torefeldtstina totalklikeungeastudyofthedialoguestyleoftheauthormirjaunge
_version_ 1719318838680485888