Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet

This paper focuses on facework used by the invited guests in a broadcasted debate. The purpose of this analysis is to investigate how the invited guests use facework and how the guest relate to their functional role within the debate. The aim is also to investigate how the phases of the debate regul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Forsberg, Lisa
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Södertörns högskola, Svenska 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-34533
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-34533
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-345332018-02-06T02:35:31ZSpelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatetsweDo they play roles? : A qualitative study on facework in the debate formatForsberg, LisaSödertörns högskola, Svenska2017faceworkconversation analysisparticipantdebatepolitenessdisagreementansiktsarbetesamtalsanalysdeltagaredebattartighetoenighetGeneral Language Studies and LinguisticsJämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistikThis paper focuses on facework used by the invited guests in a broadcasted debate. The purpose of this analysis is to investigate how the invited guests use facework and how the guest relate to their functional role within the debate. The aim is also to investigate how the phases of the debate regulate the facework used by the guests. The analysis is based on transcrition and videomaterial from one of Sweden’s most viewed debates, Opinion Live. Conversation analysis (CA) is part of the theoretical framework used to analyse support, interruption and conversation turns. To analyze facework this paper relies on Goffman’s theory of face and Muntigl & Turnbull’s four types of disagreement acts in facework and arguing. Brown & Levinson’s politeness theory has also been used to investigate facework and strategies. In addition, Svensson’s definition of the debate’s specific roles within the format has also been used. The results show that facework has two purposes. The first is that it is used to defend the guest’s own face. The other purpose is to attack other guest’s faces which implies that their functional roles in the debate are being challenged. The results also points towards that the structure of the conversation in the debate itself influence the types of facework used by the guests. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-34533application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic facework
conversation analysis
participant
debate
politeness
disagreement
ansiktsarbete
samtalsanalys
deltagare
debatt
artighet
oenighet
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik
spellingShingle facework
conversation analysis
participant
debate
politeness
disagreement
ansiktsarbete
samtalsanalys
deltagare
debatt
artighet
oenighet
General Language Studies and Linguistics
Jämförande språkvetenskap och allmän lingvistik
Forsberg, Lisa
Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
description This paper focuses on facework used by the invited guests in a broadcasted debate. The purpose of this analysis is to investigate how the invited guests use facework and how the guest relate to their functional role within the debate. The aim is also to investigate how the phases of the debate regulate the facework used by the guests. The analysis is based on transcrition and videomaterial from one of Sweden’s most viewed debates, Opinion Live. Conversation analysis (CA) is part of the theoretical framework used to analyse support, interruption and conversation turns. To analyze facework this paper relies on Goffman’s theory of face and Muntigl & Turnbull’s four types of disagreement acts in facework and arguing. Brown & Levinson’s politeness theory has also been used to investigate facework and strategies. In addition, Svensson’s definition of the debate’s specific roles within the format has also been used. The results show that facework has two purposes. The first is that it is used to defend the guest’s own face. The other purpose is to attack other guest’s faces which implies that their functional roles in the debate are being challenged. The results also points towards that the structure of the conversation in the debate itself influence the types of facework used by the guests.
author Forsberg, Lisa
author_facet Forsberg, Lisa
author_sort Forsberg, Lisa
title Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
title_short Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
title_full Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
title_fullStr Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
title_full_unstemmed Spelar de någon roll? : En kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
title_sort spelar de någon roll? : en kvalitativ studie om ansiktsarbete inom debattformatet
publisher Södertörns högskola, Svenska
publishDate 2017
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-34533
work_keys_str_mv AT forsberglisa spelardenagonrollenkvalitativstudieomansiktsarbeteinomdebattformatet
AT forsberglisa dotheyplayrolesaqualitativestudyonfaceworkinthedebateformat
_version_ 1718613417591308288