An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework

A case study of the first 35 years, 1945 to 1980, of the Swedish nuclear institution. The purpose is to discover which actors that have shaped the Swedish nuclear institution. By using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework I have analyzed these 35 years in thre...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jansson, Martin
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för naturvetenskap, miljö och teknik 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27981
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-27981
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-279812015-08-19T04:55:24ZAn atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition frameworkengJansson, MartinSödertörns högskola, Institutionen för naturvetenskap, miljö och teknik2015Nuclear powercoalitionsactorshistorical institutionalismpath dependenceadvocacy coalition frameworkenvironmental movementsA case study of the first 35 years, 1945 to 1980, of the Swedish nuclear institution. The purpose is to discover which actors that have shaped the Swedish nuclear institution. By using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework I have analyzed these 35 years in three separate parts. Historical institutionalism puts emphasis on the creation of an institution, and so have I. The creation phase goes from 1945 to 1972. The following two parts are critical junctures that spans the years 1973-1978 and 1978-1980. The first critical juncture deals with the Centre Party's reversal in their opinion on nuclear power, the 1976 election and the outcome of that election. The third juncture starts with the Harrisburg accident and ends after the 1980 referendum. Using the advocacy coalition framework to analyze the actions or actors and coalitions during these three phases, I have come to the conclusion that the industry actors, those that have built the reactors, have been the most successful in pushing their coalition's agendas, over the years. Their influence was considerable during the years of institutional creation, while the coalitions that opposed nuclear power were quite weak during this time frame, which is consistent with historical institutionalism's focus on the creation, and path dependence. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27981application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Nuclear power
coalitions
actors
historical institutionalism
path dependence
advocacy coalition framework
environmental movements
spellingShingle Nuclear power
coalitions
actors
historical institutionalism
path dependence
advocacy coalition framework
environmental movements
Jansson, Martin
An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
description A case study of the first 35 years, 1945 to 1980, of the Swedish nuclear institution. The purpose is to discover which actors that have shaped the Swedish nuclear institution. By using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework I have analyzed these 35 years in three separate parts. Historical institutionalism puts emphasis on the creation of an institution, and so have I. The creation phase goes from 1945 to 1972. The following two parts are critical junctures that spans the years 1973-1978 and 1978-1980. The first critical juncture deals with the Centre Party's reversal in their opinion on nuclear power, the 1976 election and the outcome of that election. The third juncture starts with the Harrisburg accident and ends after the 1980 referendum. Using the advocacy coalition framework to analyze the actions or actors and coalitions during these three phases, I have come to the conclusion that the industry actors, those that have built the reactors, have been the most successful in pushing their coalition's agendas, over the years. Their influence was considerable during the years of institutional creation, while the coalitions that opposed nuclear power were quite weak during this time frame, which is consistent with historical institutionalism's focus on the creation, and path dependence.
author Jansson, Martin
author_facet Jansson, Martin
author_sort Jansson, Martin
title An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
title_short An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
title_full An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
title_fullStr An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
title_full_unstemmed An atomic adventure : A case study of the history of the Swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
title_sort atomic adventure : a case study of the history of the swedish nuclear policy using the theories of historical institutionalism and advocacy coalition framework
publisher Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för naturvetenskap, miljö och teknik
publishDate 2015
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-27981
work_keys_str_mv AT janssonmartin anatomicadventureacasestudyofthehistoryoftheswedishnuclearpolicyusingthetheoriesofhistoricalinstitutionalismandadvocacycoalitionframework
AT janssonmartin atomicadventureacasestudyofthehistoryoftheswedishnuclearpolicyusingthetheoriesofhistoricalinstitutionalismandadvocacycoalitionframework
_version_ 1716817244634218496