Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1

This thesis is based on a conversation about gender identity and the pronoun hen in an episode of the radio programme Tendens on Swedish public radio, P1. The participants of the conversation are a scholar and a journalist/show-host. The goal of the research has been to analyse how the conversation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Waldner, Linnea
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande 2012
Subjects:
hen
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18163
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-18163
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-sh-181632013-01-30T03:44:56ZHen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1sweWaldner, LinneaSödertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande2012language and gendergender identityhentopicdiscoursepositioningradionormslanguage usagespråk och könkönsidentitethentopikdiskurspositioneringradionormspråkbrukThis thesis is based on a conversation about gender identity and the pronoun hen in an episode of the radio programme Tendens on Swedish public radio, P1. The participants of the conversation are a scholar and a journalist/show-host. The goal of the research has been to analyse how the conversation is constructed from its context and which topics that occur. The goal of the research has also been to analyse how the participants of the conversation position themselves and how the conversation composes and re-composes norms and values regarding gender identity in society. Critical discourse analysis, completed by Conversation analysis has been the theoretical and methodological approach. The result shows that the conversation functions well within its context and that the host Söderqvist and scholar Milles undertakedifferent parts and contributions in the interaction. The host undertakes the part as the presenter and questioner of problems and topics, which Milles then refute in her role as an expert. The result also shows that Söderqvist and Milles give voice to a diversity of topical and interactional positionings in the conversation, but that Söderqvist mainly positions himself as the audience’s representative. Furthermore the result shows that the participants recreate gender identity norms in the conversation. Milles dictums also carry tendencies to create and broaden norms. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18163application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic language and gender
gender identity
hen
topic
discourse
positioning
radio
norms
language usage
språk och kön
könsidentitet
hen
topik
diskurs
positionering
radio
norm
språkbruk
spellingShingle language and gender
gender identity
hen
topic
discourse
positioning
radio
norms
language usage
språk och kön
könsidentitet
hen
topik
diskurs
positionering
radio
norm
språkbruk
Waldner, Linnea
Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1
description This thesis is based on a conversation about gender identity and the pronoun hen in an episode of the radio programme Tendens on Swedish public radio, P1. The participants of the conversation are a scholar and a journalist/show-host. The goal of the research has been to analyse how the conversation is constructed from its context and which topics that occur. The goal of the research has also been to analyse how the participants of the conversation position themselves and how the conversation composes and re-composes norms and values regarding gender identity in society. Critical discourse analysis, completed by Conversation analysis has been the theoretical and methodological approach. The result shows that the conversation functions well within its context and that the host Söderqvist and scholar Milles undertakedifferent parts and contributions in the interaction. The host undertakes the part as the presenter and questioner of problems and topics, which Milles then refute in her role as an expert. The result also shows that Söderqvist and Milles give voice to a diversity of topical and interactional positionings in the conversation, but that Söderqvist mainly positions himself as the audience’s representative. Furthermore the result shows that the participants recreate gender identity norms in the conversation. Milles dictums also carry tendencies to create and broaden norms.
author Waldner, Linnea
author_facet Waldner, Linnea
author_sort Waldner, Linnea
title Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1
title_short Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1
title_full Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1
title_fullStr Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1
title_full_unstemmed Hen, vi och dom : En diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i Tendens i P1
title_sort hen, vi och dom : en diskursanalytisk studie av ett samtal om hen och könsidentitet i tendens i p1
publisher Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för kultur och lärande
publishDate 2012
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18163
work_keys_str_mv AT waldnerlinnea henviochdomendiskursanalytiskstudieavettsamtalomhenochkonsidentitetitendensip1
_version_ 1716576365637009408