Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
Introduction: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwideaffecting the tonsils, the soft palette and the base of the tongue. OPC has a high risk ofrecurrence. Patients are offered a 5-year follow-up program in order to discover earlyrecurrences. However, there exists some c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93177 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-93177 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-931772021-07-30T05:32:18ZRecurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudyengLind, MimmiÖrebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper2021Oropharyngeal cancerhead- and neck cancerrecurrencesurveillanceroutine follow-upMedical and Health SciencesMedicin och hälsovetenskapIntroduction: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwideaffecting the tonsils, the soft palette and the base of the tongue. OPC has a high risk ofrecurrence. Patients are offered a 5-year follow-up program in order to discover earlyrecurrences. However, there exists some controversy regarding the benefit of this follow-up indetecting early recurrences. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether recurrences of OPC weredetected in patient-initiated appointments or during routine follow-up. The secondary aim wasto compare the survival between these groups. Method and materials: This study is a retrospective cohort study regarding recurrencedetection among patients diagnosed with OPC. The Örebro Head- and neck cancer registerwas used to identify patients with recurrence of OPC. Additional data was collected frommedical records. Results: A total of 75 patients were included. Routine follow-up detected 50.7% ofrecurrences while patient-initiated visits detected 42.7% of recurrences. No statisticallysignificant difference was found in survival between these groups Conclusion: In contradiction to our hypothesis most of the recurrences were detected atroutine follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between thetwo ways of detection. These results indicate that our current follow-up program has animportance in detecting early recurrences and should not be altered. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93177application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Oropharyngeal cancer head- and neck cancer recurrence surveillance routine follow-up Medical and Health Sciences Medicin och hälsovetenskap |
spellingShingle |
Oropharyngeal cancer head- and neck cancer recurrence surveillance routine follow-up Medical and Health Sciences Medicin och hälsovetenskap Lind, Mimmi Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
description |
Introduction: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwideaffecting the tonsils, the soft palette and the base of the tongue. OPC has a high risk ofrecurrence. Patients are offered a 5-year follow-up program in order to discover earlyrecurrences. However, there exists some controversy regarding the benefit of this follow-up indetecting early recurrences. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether recurrences of OPC weredetected in patient-initiated appointments or during routine follow-up. The secondary aim wasto compare the survival between these groups. Method and materials: This study is a retrospective cohort study regarding recurrencedetection among patients diagnosed with OPC. The Örebro Head- and neck cancer registerwas used to identify patients with recurrence of OPC. Additional data was collected frommedical records. Results: A total of 75 patients were included. Routine follow-up detected 50.7% ofrecurrences while patient-initiated visits detected 42.7% of recurrences. No statisticallysignificant difference was found in survival between these groups Conclusion: In contradiction to our hypothesis most of the recurrences were detected atroutine follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between thetwo ways of detection. These results indicate that our current follow-up program has animportance in detecting early recurrences and should not be altered. |
author |
Lind, Mimmi |
author_facet |
Lind, Mimmi |
author_sort |
Lind, Mimmi |
title |
Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
title_short |
Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
title_full |
Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
title_fullStr |
Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
title_sort |
recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy |
publisher |
Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper |
publishDate |
2021 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93177 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT lindmimmi recurrencedetectioninoropharyngealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy |
_version_ |
1719418209339179008 |