Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy

Introduction: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwideaffecting the tonsils, the soft palette and the base of the tongue. OPC has a high risk ofrecurrence. Patients are offered a 5-year follow-up program in order to discover earlyrecurrences. However, there exists some c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lind, Mimmi
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93177
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-93177
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-oru-931772021-07-30T05:32:18ZRecurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudyengLind, MimmiÖrebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper2021Oropharyngeal cancerhead- and neck cancerrecurrencesurveillanceroutine follow-upMedical and Health SciencesMedicin och hälsovetenskapIntroduction: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwideaffecting the tonsils, the soft palette and the base of the tongue. OPC has a high risk ofrecurrence. Patients are offered a 5-year follow-up program in order to discover earlyrecurrences. However, there exists some controversy regarding the benefit of this follow-up indetecting early recurrences. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether recurrences of OPC weredetected in patient-initiated appointments or during routine follow-up. The secondary aim wasto compare the survival between these groups. Method and materials: This study is a retrospective cohort study regarding recurrencedetection among patients diagnosed with OPC. The Örebro Head- and neck cancer registerwas used to identify patients with recurrence of OPC. Additional data was collected frommedical records. Results: A total of 75 patients were included. Routine follow-up detected 50.7% ofrecurrences while patient-initiated visits detected 42.7% of recurrences. No statisticallysignificant difference was found in survival between these groups Conclusion: In contradiction to our hypothesis most of the recurrences were detected atroutine follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between thetwo ways of detection. These results indicate that our current follow-up program has animportance in detecting early recurrences and should not be altered.   Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93177application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Oropharyngeal cancer
head- and neck cancer
recurrence
surveillance
routine follow-up
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
spellingShingle Oropharyngeal cancer
head- and neck cancer
recurrence
surveillance
routine follow-up
Medical and Health Sciences
Medicin och hälsovetenskap
Lind, Mimmi
Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
description Introduction: Oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) is a highly prevalent malignancy worldwideaffecting the tonsils, the soft palette and the base of the tongue. OPC has a high risk ofrecurrence. Patients are offered a 5-year follow-up program in order to discover earlyrecurrences. However, there exists some controversy regarding the benefit of this follow-up indetecting early recurrences. Objective: The primary aim of this study was to investigate whether recurrences of OPC weredetected in patient-initiated appointments or during routine follow-up. The secondary aim wasto compare the survival between these groups. Method and materials: This study is a retrospective cohort study regarding recurrencedetection among patients diagnosed with OPC. The Örebro Head- and neck cancer registerwas used to identify patients with recurrence of OPC. Additional data was collected frommedical records. Results: A total of 75 patients were included. Routine follow-up detected 50.7% ofrecurrences while patient-initiated visits detected 42.7% of recurrences. No statisticallysignificant difference was found in survival between these groups Conclusion: In contradiction to our hypothesis most of the recurrences were detected atroutine follow-up. There was no statistically significant difference in survival between thetwo ways of detection. These results indicate that our current follow-up program has animportance in detecting early recurrences and should not be altered.  
author Lind, Mimmi
author_facet Lind, Mimmi
author_sort Lind, Mimmi
title Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
title_short Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
title_full Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
title_fullStr Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
title_full_unstemmed Recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
title_sort recurrence detection in oropharyngeal cancer –a retrospective cohortstudy
publisher Örebro universitet, Institutionen för medicinska vetenskaper
publishDate 2021
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-93177
work_keys_str_mv AT lindmimmi recurrencedetectioninoropharyngealcanceraretrospectivecohortstudy
_version_ 1719418209339179008