Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN

This project is aimed at making comparison between current existing Internet- of-Things (IoT) platforms, SensibleThings (ST) and Global Sensors Networks (GSN). Project can be served as a further work of platforms’ investigation. Comparing and learning from each other aim to contribute to the improve...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Wang, Kaidi
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Mittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för informations- och kommunikationssystem 2016
Subjects:
IoT
GSN
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-28099
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-miun-28099
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-miun-280992018-01-11T05:11:35ZTheoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSNengWang, KaidiMittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för informations- och kommunikationssystem2016IoTGSNSensibleThingsFully distributed systemPartially decentralized systemSoftware EngineeringProgramvaruteknikThis project is aimed at making comparison between current existing Internet- of-Things (IoT) platforms, SensibleThings (ST) and Global Sensors Networks (GSN). Project can be served as a further work of platforms’ investigation. Comparing and learning from each other aim to contribute to the improvement of future platforms development. Detailed comparison is mainly with the respect of platform feature, communication and data present-frequency performance under stress, and platform node scalability performance on one limited device. Study is conducted through developing applications on each platform, and making measuring performance under the same condition in household network environment. So far, all these respects have had results and been concluded. Qualitatively comparing, GSN performs better in the facets of node’s swift development and deployment, data management, node subscription and connection retry mechanism. Whereas, ST is superior in respects of network package encryption, platform reliability, session initializing latency, and degree of developing freedom. In quantitative comparison, nodes on GSN has better data push pressure resistence while ST nodes works with lower session latency. In terms of data present-frequency, ST node can reach higher updating frequency than GSN node. In the aspect of node sclability on one limited device, ST nodes take the advantage in averagely lower latency than GSN node when nodes number is less than 15 on limited device. But due to sharing mechanism of GSN, on one limited device, it's nodes shows more scalable if platform nodes have similar job. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-28099Local DT-V16-G3-016application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic IoT
GSN
SensibleThings
Fully distributed system
Partially decentralized system
Software Engineering
Programvaruteknik
spellingShingle IoT
GSN
SensibleThings
Fully distributed system
Partially decentralized system
Software Engineering
Programvaruteknik
Wang, Kaidi
Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN
description This project is aimed at making comparison between current existing Internet- of-Things (IoT) platforms, SensibleThings (ST) and Global Sensors Networks (GSN). Project can be served as a further work of platforms’ investigation. Comparing and learning from each other aim to contribute to the improvement of future platforms development. Detailed comparison is mainly with the respect of platform feature, communication and data present-frequency performance under stress, and platform node scalability performance on one limited device. Study is conducted through developing applications on each platform, and making measuring performance under the same condition in household network environment. So far, all these respects have had results and been concluded. Qualitatively comparing, GSN performs better in the facets of node’s swift development and deployment, data management, node subscription and connection retry mechanism. Whereas, ST is superior in respects of network package encryption, platform reliability, session initializing latency, and degree of developing freedom. In quantitative comparison, nodes on GSN has better data push pressure resistence while ST nodes works with lower session latency. In terms of data present-frequency, ST node can reach higher updating frequency than GSN node. In the aspect of node sclability on one limited device, ST nodes take the advantage in averagely lower latency than GSN node when nodes number is less than 15 on limited device. But due to sharing mechanism of GSN, on one limited device, it's nodes shows more scalable if platform nodes have similar job.
author Wang, Kaidi
author_facet Wang, Kaidi
author_sort Wang, Kaidi
title Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN
title_short Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN
title_full Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN
title_fullStr Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN
title_full_unstemmed Theoretical and Quantitative Comparison of SensibleThings and GSN
title_sort theoretical and quantitative comparison of sensiblethings and gsn
publisher Mittuniversitetet, Avdelningen för informations- och kommunikationssystem
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:miun:diva-28099
work_keys_str_mv AT wangkaidi theoreticalandquantitativecomparisonofsensiblethingsandgsn
_version_ 1718604497492639744