The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process

This thesis uses an interpretative case study of the Rwandan genocide to explore and analyze factors in the decision-making process of the United Nations. Using defensive structural realism and its concepts and theories explained by Stephen Walt, a level-by-level analyses is conducted.             C...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Krüger, Sandra
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Malmö universitet, Malmö högskola, Institutionen för globala politiska studier (GPS) 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-43618
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-mau-43618
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-mau-436182021-06-17T05:24:32ZThe Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making ProcessengKrüger, SandraMalmö universitet, Malmö högskola, Institutionen för globala politiska studier (GPS)2021GenocideRealismUnited NationsUncertaintyRwandaDecision-MakingPolitical Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)This thesis uses an interpretative case study of the Rwandan genocide to explore and analyze factors in the decision-making process of the United Nations. Using defensive structural realism and its concepts and theories explained by Stephen Walt, a level-by-level analyses is conducted.             Conducted from a realist point of view, the study found that there was no clear way to foresee the upcoming genocide for certain, yet the increase in violence in the near future was. Yet, the UN member states were still dealing with the aftermath of their intervention in Somalia which, besides other factors, lead to a broken will of the member states to support the UNAMIR mission when it became clear that it would not be an easy and quick peace mission. With this reluctancy the member states did indeed limit the possibilities for the UN to act but the Security Council as well as any other competent bodies of the UN could have called upon the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in order to get everyone to pull on one string.              The conclusions from the analysis suggest, that a broad spectrum of factors motivated the decision-making process at that time. It is impossible to know exactly who knew what, but in this case, it became clear that the decision-making bodies of the UN did not adequately respond to the situation at hand, genocide or not, because of factors which had nothing to do with the original conflict. Such as the repercussions from the Somalia intervention or simple miscommunication within and between departments. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-43618application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Genocide
Realism
United Nations
Uncertainty
Rwanda
Decision-Making
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
spellingShingle Genocide
Realism
United Nations
Uncertainty
Rwanda
Decision-Making
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Krüger, Sandra
The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process
description This thesis uses an interpretative case study of the Rwandan genocide to explore and analyze factors in the decision-making process of the United Nations. Using defensive structural realism and its concepts and theories explained by Stephen Walt, a level-by-level analyses is conducted.             Conducted from a realist point of view, the study found that there was no clear way to foresee the upcoming genocide for certain, yet the increase in violence in the near future was. Yet, the UN member states were still dealing with the aftermath of their intervention in Somalia which, besides other factors, lead to a broken will of the member states to support the UNAMIR mission when it became clear that it would not be an easy and quick peace mission. With this reluctancy the member states did indeed limit the possibilities for the UN to act but the Security Council as well as any other competent bodies of the UN could have called upon the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in order to get everyone to pull on one string.              The conclusions from the analysis suggest, that a broad spectrum of factors motivated the decision-making process at that time. It is impossible to know exactly who knew what, but in this case, it became clear that the decision-making bodies of the UN did not adequately respond to the situation at hand, genocide or not, because of factors which had nothing to do with the original conflict. Such as the repercussions from the Somalia intervention or simple miscommunication within and between departments.
author Krüger, Sandra
author_facet Krüger, Sandra
author_sort Krüger, Sandra
title The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process
title_short The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process
title_full The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process
title_fullStr The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process
title_full_unstemmed The Genocide in Rwanda : An Interpretative Case Study of the UN Decision-Making Process
title_sort genocide in rwanda : an interpretative case study of the un decision-making process
publisher Malmö universitet, Malmö högskola, Institutionen för globala politiska studier (GPS)
publishDate 2021
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-43618
work_keys_str_mv AT krugersandra thegenocideinrwandaaninterpretativecasestudyoftheundecisionmakingprocess
AT krugersandra genocideinrwandaaninterpretativecasestudyoftheundecisionmakingprocess
_version_ 1719410867631554560