Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker?
There is no universal view on written corrective feedback, the existing research does not agree on whether it is effective or not. Therefore, this degree paper aims to find out if teachers engage in written corrective feedback, and if so, then also how they do it. Moreover, this it gives an insight...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS)
2018
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-33518 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-mau-33518 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-mau-335182020-11-05T05:29:01ZTeacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker?engGottsäter, JohanMalmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS)Malmö universitet/Lärande och samhälle2018Humanities and the ArtsHumaniora och konstThere is no universal view on written corrective feedback, the existing research does not agree on whether it is effective or not. Therefore, this degree paper aims to find out if teachers engage in written corrective feedback, and if so, then also how they do it. Moreover, this it gives an insight into the previous research on the area, which is compared to the findings of this paper. This study is based on a survey which 27 English teachers at the upper secondary school answered, and the follow-up semi-structured interviews with three of the 27 participants in the survey. The findings include that the teachers who participated in the survey of this paper do engage in written corrective feedback to a large extent. In addition, the teachers also reported that they do so most often through providing students with comments in the margin of the students’ texts. The three conclusions of this degree paper are as follows. Firstly, the interviewed teachers believe that their written corrective feedback improves their students’ proficiency. Secondly, the most common methods for providing written corrective feedback amongst the teachers are also the most time consuming alternative. Thirdly, when it comes to scaffolding, the most common method amongst the participating teachers is providing students with information where students can find the correct answer, as the teachers argue this creates a learning opportunity for the students. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-33518Local 25102application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Humanities and the Arts Humaniora och konst |
spellingShingle |
Humanities and the Arts Humaniora och konst Gottsäter, Johan Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker? |
description |
There is no universal view on written corrective feedback, the existing research does not agree on whether it is effective or not. Therefore, this degree paper aims to find out if teachers engage in written corrective feedback, and if so, then also how they do it. Moreover, this it gives an insight into the previous research on the area, which is compared to the findings of this paper. This study is based on a survey which 27 English teachers at the upper secondary school answered, and the follow-up semi-structured interviews with three of the 27 participants in the survey. The findings include that the teachers who participated in the survey of this paper do engage in written corrective feedback to a large extent. In addition, the teachers also reported that they do so most often through providing students with comments in the margin of the students’ texts. The three conclusions of this degree paper are as follows. Firstly, the interviewed teachers believe that their written corrective feedback improves their students’ proficiency. Secondly, the most common methods for providing written corrective feedback amongst the teachers are also the most time consuming alternative. Thirdly, when it comes to scaffolding, the most common method amongst the participating teachers is providing students with information where students can find the correct answer, as the teachers argue this creates a learning opportunity for the students. |
author |
Gottsäter, Johan |
author_facet |
Gottsäter, Johan |
author_sort |
Gottsäter, Johan |
title |
Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker? |
title_short |
Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker? |
title_full |
Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker? |
title_fullStr |
Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Teacher Feedback on Grammar Errors: Stimulus for Learning or Confidence Breaker? |
title_sort |
teacher feedback on grammar errors: stimulus for learning or confidence breaker? |
publisher |
Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för lärande och samhälle (LS) |
publishDate |
2018 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-33518 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT gottsaterjohan teacherfeedbackongrammarerrorsstimulusforlearningorconfidencebreaker |
_version_ |
1719355485266640896 |