'Catch-22'?: The Assessment of Credibility in UK Asylum Applications
This study aims to contribute to an understanding of how the credibility of asylum-seekers is being assessed in the UK; how narratives are valued by decision-makers and tribunal judges, how applicants’ credibility is determined, and what issues may be found with this process. I conducted interviews...
Main Author: | Kendall, Frances |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Malmö universitet, Fakulteten för kultur och samhälle (KS)
2020
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:mau:diva-22643 |
Similar Items
-
‘Because Migri Says So’: Legitimation in Negative Asylum Decisions in Finland
by: Erna Bodström
Published: (2020-05-01) -
Resilience among asylum seekers living with HIV
by: Orton Lois, et al.
Published: (2012-10-01) -
Impact of asylum interviews on the mental health of traumatized asylum seekers
by: Katrin Schock, et al.
Published: (2015-09-01) -
Turning Asylum Seekers into ‘Dangerous Criminals’: Experiences of the Criminal Justice System of those Seeking Sanctuary
by: Monish Bhatia
Published: (2015-10-01) -
Mental healthcare for asylum-seekers and refugees residing in the United Kingdom: a scoping review of policies, barriers, and enablers
by: Teresa Pollard, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)