The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement

The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the Swedish moose populationof a new moose management system introduced in 2012. To this end, the size of thepopulation had to be measured. The methodology used was an empirical version of theGordon–Schaefer bioeconomic model previously employe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kärrman, Victoria
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77069
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-ltu-77069
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-ltu-770692019-12-07T03:50:11ZThe effects of the Swedish moosemanagementengKärrman, VictoriaLuleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle2019Wildlife managementmoosepopulation growthpopulation densityGordon–Schaefer modelbioeconomicsEconomicsNationalekonomiThe purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the Swedish moose populationof a new moose management system introduced in 2012. To this end, the size of thepopulation had to be measured. The methodology used was an empirical version of theGordon–Schaefer bioeconomic model previously employed to estimate Sweden’s wildboar population. The Effort variable for the model was modified in that traffic accidentsrelative to traffic density served as a proxy for it. The study investigated years for whichdata was available, namely 2004–2017. Nineteen out of Sweden’s 21 Counties wereincluded in the study. The result produced extremely high population estimates,suggesting that the model could not be directly transferred from wild boar to moose.Nonetheless, although the study’s population estimates in absolute terms are unrealistic,their relative sizes indicate that moose populations were somewhat smaller in 2017 thanin 2012 – the latter year being when the new management system was introduced.However, the trend line shows that, over a longer period, the moose population hasincreased in Sweden, and 2017 may just be a temporary deviation from that trend. Itappears, therefore, that Sweden’s latest moose management system does not have thedesired effect on its moose population. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77069application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Wildlife management
moose
population growth
population density
Gordon–Schaefer model
bioeconomics
Economics
Nationalekonomi
spellingShingle Wildlife management
moose
population growth
population density
Gordon–Schaefer model
bioeconomics
Economics
Nationalekonomi
Kärrman, Victoria
The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
description The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the Swedish moose populationof a new moose management system introduced in 2012. To this end, the size of thepopulation had to be measured. The methodology used was an empirical version of theGordon–Schaefer bioeconomic model previously employed to estimate Sweden’s wildboar population. The Effort variable for the model was modified in that traffic accidentsrelative to traffic density served as a proxy for it. The study investigated years for whichdata was available, namely 2004–2017. Nineteen out of Sweden’s 21 Counties wereincluded in the study. The result produced extremely high population estimates,suggesting that the model could not be directly transferred from wild boar to moose.Nonetheless, although the study’s population estimates in absolute terms are unrealistic,their relative sizes indicate that moose populations were somewhat smaller in 2017 thanin 2012 – the latter year being when the new management system was introduced.However, the trend line shows that, over a longer period, the moose population hasincreased in Sweden, and 2017 may just be a temporary deviation from that trend. Itappears, therefore, that Sweden’s latest moose management system does not have thedesired effect on its moose population.
author Kärrman, Victoria
author_facet Kärrman, Victoria
author_sort Kärrman, Victoria
title The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
title_short The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
title_full The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
title_fullStr The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
title_full_unstemmed The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
title_sort effects of the swedish moosemanagement
publisher Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle
publishDate 2019
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77069
work_keys_str_mv AT karrmanvictoria theeffectsoftheswedishmoosemanagement
AT karrmanvictoria effectsoftheswedishmoosemanagement
_version_ 1719302359649091584