The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the Swedish moose populationof a new moose management system introduced in 2012. To this end, the size of thepopulation had to be measured. The methodology used was an empirical version of theGordon–Schaefer bioeconomic model previously employe...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77069 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-ltu-77069 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-ltu-770692019-12-07T03:50:11ZThe effects of the Swedish moosemanagementengKärrman, VictoriaLuleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle2019Wildlife managementmoosepopulation growthpopulation densityGordon–Schaefer modelbioeconomicsEconomicsNationalekonomiThe purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the Swedish moose populationof a new moose management system introduced in 2012. To this end, the size of thepopulation had to be measured. The methodology used was an empirical version of theGordon–Schaefer bioeconomic model previously employed to estimate Sweden’s wildboar population. The Effort variable for the model was modified in that traffic accidentsrelative to traffic density served as a proxy for it. The study investigated years for whichdata was available, namely 2004–2017. Nineteen out of Sweden’s 21 Counties wereincluded in the study. The result produced extremely high population estimates,suggesting that the model could not be directly transferred from wild boar to moose.Nonetheless, although the study’s population estimates in absolute terms are unrealistic,their relative sizes indicate that moose populations were somewhat smaller in 2017 thanin 2012 – the latter year being when the new management system was introduced.However, the trend line shows that, over a longer period, the moose population hasincreased in Sweden, and 2017 may just be a temporary deviation from that trend. Itappears, therefore, that Sweden’s latest moose management system does not have thedesired effect on its moose population. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77069application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Wildlife management moose population growth population density Gordon–Schaefer model bioeconomics Economics Nationalekonomi |
spellingShingle |
Wildlife management moose population growth population density Gordon–Schaefer model bioeconomics Economics Nationalekonomi Kärrman, Victoria The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement |
description |
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects on the Swedish moose populationof a new moose management system introduced in 2012. To this end, the size of thepopulation had to be measured. The methodology used was an empirical version of theGordon–Schaefer bioeconomic model previously employed to estimate Sweden’s wildboar population. The Effort variable for the model was modified in that traffic accidentsrelative to traffic density served as a proxy for it. The study investigated years for whichdata was available, namely 2004–2017. Nineteen out of Sweden’s 21 Counties wereincluded in the study. The result produced extremely high population estimates,suggesting that the model could not be directly transferred from wild boar to moose.Nonetheless, although the study’s population estimates in absolute terms are unrealistic,their relative sizes indicate that moose populations were somewhat smaller in 2017 thanin 2012 – the latter year being when the new management system was introduced.However, the trend line shows that, over a longer period, the moose population hasincreased in Sweden, and 2017 may just be a temporary deviation from that trend. Itappears, therefore, that Sweden’s latest moose management system does not have thedesired effect on its moose population. |
author |
Kärrman, Victoria |
author_facet |
Kärrman, Victoria |
author_sort |
Kärrman, Victoria |
title |
The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement |
title_short |
The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement |
title_full |
The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement |
title_fullStr |
The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effects of the Swedish moosemanagement |
title_sort |
effects of the swedish moosemanagement |
publisher |
Luleå tekniska universitet, Institutionen för ekonomi, teknik och samhälle |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:ltu:diva-77069 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT karrmanvictoria theeffectsoftheswedishmoosemanagement AT karrmanvictoria effectsoftheswedishmoosemanagement |
_version_ |
1719302359649091584 |