Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter

The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare Twitter feeds of the eight political parties in the Swedish parliament, together with their party leaders, during the political summit Almedalen week 2017. The communication theories gatekeeping and agenda setting are applied to the first two research...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Burstrand, Hanna
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-69718
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-69718
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-697182018-01-18T05:38:53ZAlmedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på TwitterswePolitical Communication on Twitter : A look at the Swedish Parliamentary parties and their leaders during the Political Summit in Almedalen 2017Burstrand, HannaLinnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST)2018Social MediaTwitterPolitical CommunicationAlmedalenSwedenPolitical Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare Twitter feeds of the eight political parties in the Swedish parliament, together with their party leaders, during the political summit Almedalen week 2017. The communication theories gatekeeping and agenda setting are applied to the first two research questions: How do official Twitter accounts of political parties differ from party-leader accounts when it comes to (1a) frequency and dispersion of tweets, (1b) agenda setting? How does different parties’ communication diverge regarding (2a) frequency and dispersion, (2b) agenda setting? Finally, Political personalization theory is applied to the third research question: (3) To what extent are party leaders utilized in party communication on Twitter?        There are 655 identified tweets during Almedalen 2017. These make up the empirical material of a content analysis following a coding scheme, attached in appendix 1. Interesting findings include: official party accounts use strategic dispersion methods such as established hashtags, party leaders do not. Party accounts have a stronger agenda-setting role, while party leaders tend to forward media content. Opposition parties are more active on Twitter than governing parties. Female opposition leaders are the only party leaders tweeting laid-back photos of themselves in their professional capacity. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-69718application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Social Media
Twitter
Political Communication
Almedalen
Sweden
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
spellingShingle Social Media
Twitter
Political Communication
Almedalen
Sweden
Political Science (excluding Public Administration Studies and Globalisation Studies)
Statsvetenskap (exklusive studier av offentlig förvaltning och globaliseringsstudier)
Burstrand, Hanna
Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter
description The aim of this paper is to analyze and compare Twitter feeds of the eight political parties in the Swedish parliament, together with their party leaders, during the political summit Almedalen week 2017. The communication theories gatekeeping and agenda setting are applied to the first two research questions: How do official Twitter accounts of political parties differ from party-leader accounts when it comes to (1a) frequency and dispersion of tweets, (1b) agenda setting? How does different parties’ communication diverge regarding (2a) frequency and dispersion, (2b) agenda setting? Finally, Political personalization theory is applied to the third research question: (3) To what extent are party leaders utilized in party communication on Twitter?        There are 655 identified tweets during Almedalen 2017. These make up the empirical material of a content analysis following a coding scheme, attached in appendix 1. Interesting findings include: official party accounts use strategic dispersion methods such as established hashtags, party leaders do not. Party accounts have a stronger agenda-setting role, while party leaders tend to forward media content. Opposition parties are more active on Twitter than governing parties. Female opposition leaders are the only party leaders tweeting laid-back photos of themselves in their professional capacity.
author Burstrand, Hanna
author_facet Burstrand, Hanna
author_sort Burstrand, Hanna
title Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter
title_short Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter
title_full Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter
title_fullStr Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Almedalen 2017 : Svenska Partier och Partiledares Aktivitet på Twitter
title_sort almedalen 2017 : svenska partier och partiledares aktivitet på twitter
publisher Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST)
publishDate 2018
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-69718
work_keys_str_mv AT burstrandhanna almedalen2017svenskapartierochpartiledaresaktivitetpatwitter
AT burstrandhanna politicalcommunicationontwitteralookattheswedishparliamentarypartiesandtheirleadersduringthepoliticalsummitinalmedalen2017
_version_ 1718611369310289920