Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014

This paper investigates whether national and entrepreneurial framework conditions positively affect economic growth via its effects on entrepreneurial activity more significantly than via its effects on technological innovation intensity1 . The revised GEM conceptual model is tested for a sample of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Slabenakova, Andrea
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för organisation och entreprenörskap (OE) 2016
Subjects:
GCI
GEM
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-54513
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-54513
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-545132016-07-06T05:08:51ZDo national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014engSlabenakova, AndreaLinnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för organisation och entreprenörskap (OE)2016Economic GrowthGCIGEMpath analysisThis paper investigates whether national and entrepreneurial framework conditions positively affect economic growth via its effects on entrepreneurial activity more significantly than via its effects on technological innovation intensity1 . The revised GEM conceptual model is tested for a sample of Nordic countries (Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland), between the years 2005-2014, using path analysis. The variables representing national and entrepreneurial framework conditions, entrepreneurial activity, technological innovation intensity and economic growth are Global Competitiveness Index (which includes also number of procedures to start a business and number of days to start a business, venture capital availability etc.), selfemployed workers (expressed as % of total employed), RD expenditures (expressed as % of GDP) and GDP per capita. In each of the models, the author finds out a positive effect of national and entrepreneurial framework conditions. The hypotheses stating the positive indirect influence of national and entrepreneurial framework conditions on economic growth via entrepreneurial activity (H1) and the positive indirect influence of national and entrepreneurial framework conditions via technological innovation intensity (H2) have been accepted. The calculated total effect on economic growth indicates that the path via entrepreneurship (H1) is more significant (H3). Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-54513application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Economic Growth
GCI
GEM
path analysis
spellingShingle Economic Growth
GCI
GEM
path analysis
Slabenakova, Andrea
Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
description This paper investigates whether national and entrepreneurial framework conditions positively affect economic growth via its effects on entrepreneurial activity more significantly than via its effects on technological innovation intensity1 . The revised GEM conceptual model is tested for a sample of Nordic countries (Norway, Finland, Sweden, Denmark, Iceland), between the years 2005-2014, using path analysis. The variables representing national and entrepreneurial framework conditions, entrepreneurial activity, technological innovation intensity and economic growth are Global Competitiveness Index (which includes also number of procedures to start a business and number of days to start a business, venture capital availability etc.), selfemployed workers (expressed as % of total employed), RD expenditures (expressed as % of GDP) and GDP per capita. In each of the models, the author finds out a positive effect of national and entrepreneurial framework conditions. The hypotheses stating the positive indirect influence of national and entrepreneurial framework conditions on economic growth via entrepreneurial activity (H1) and the positive indirect influence of national and entrepreneurial framework conditions via technological innovation intensity (H2) have been accepted. The calculated total effect on economic growth indicates that the path via entrepreneurship (H1) is more significant (H3).
author Slabenakova, Andrea
author_facet Slabenakova, Andrea
author_sort Slabenakova, Andrea
title Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
title_short Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
title_full Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
title_fullStr Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
title_full_unstemmed Do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : Using path analysis (PA) on the example of Nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
title_sort do national and entrepreneurial framework conditions influence economic growth? : using path analysis (pa) on the example of nordic countries between the years 2005-2014
publisher Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för organisation och entreprenörskap (OE)
publishDate 2016
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-54513
work_keys_str_mv AT slabenakovaandrea donationalandentrepreneurialframeworkconditionsinfluenceeconomicgrowthusingpathanalysispaontheexampleofnordiccountriesbetweentheyears20052014
_version_ 1718339296016990208