Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor

The starting point of this study is that the news media in general strongly influence which topics determine the public agenda by their choice of what is considered newsworthy. The study is based on articles from two major Swedish daily newspapers, Svenska Dagbladet and Dagens Nyheter.  The aim of o...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Andreasson Lindelöw, Josefin, Nilsson, Therese
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, SV 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-13791
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-13791
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-137912013-01-08T13:32:48ZMiljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågorsweEnvironmental communication in the daily press : A discourse analysis of SvD and DN portraying the environmental debateAndreasson Lindelöw, JosefinNilsson, ThereseLinnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, SVLinnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, SV2011environmentclimatesustainable developmentdemocratic conversationsagenda settinggate keeperframingCDA critical discourse analysisMedia and communication studiesMedie- och kommunikationsvetenskapThe starting point of this study is that the news media in general strongly influence which topics determine the public agenda by their choice of what is considered newsworthy. The study is based on articles from two major Swedish daily newspapers, Svenska Dagbladet and Dagens Nyheter.  The aim of our thesis is to establish how the environmental public debate as portrayed in the newspaper corresponds to the environmental discussion within the scientific (subject matter expert) field, that is taught by the academic institutions, or if the two materially differ. The environmental communication discourse at the academic institutions advocates ‘episodic’ formation as the driving force behind transformation of attitudes and behavioral preconceptions. This episodic formation is aimed at incentivizing change by creating intimacy to the incident by linking cause and consequence to the individual citizen instead of to society as a whole. The analysis consists of approximately 50 articles, all published in year 2010, and is based on CDA (Critical Discourse Analysis) where we sought to map out the discourses that frame the representation of environmental topics in these two daily newspapers.  The result shows that the newspapers account of environmental topics only weakly corresponds to the scientific account. The media representation mainly adopts a ‘thematic’ formation in which environmental topics are frequently approached by means of distancing itself or taking a broader and detached stance instead of a specific and attached link to the individual. The result thus shows that the newspapers discourse practice does not positively drive changes to attitudes and behaviors but rather reinforces the prevailing discourse and social posture in society. At the same time the analysis shows that the two newspapers form a forum where many different views and values are being voiced and where many different groups in society are represented in democratic spirit. Both supporting and inhibiting views are presented in this context. If the newspapers overall discourse practice promotes or inhibits transformation of the public’s environmental attitudes and behavior tends towards that ‘status quo’ is upheld at the expense of change. This despite, environmental topics are considered important by the Swedish public in general.  Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-13791application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic environment
climate
sustainable development
democratic conversations
agenda setting
gate keeper
framing
CDA critical discourse analysis
Media and communication studies
Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap
spellingShingle environment
climate
sustainable development
democratic conversations
agenda setting
gate keeper
framing
CDA critical discourse analysis
Media and communication studies
Medie- och kommunikationsvetenskap
Andreasson Lindelöw, Josefin
Nilsson, Therese
Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor
description The starting point of this study is that the news media in general strongly influence which topics determine the public agenda by their choice of what is considered newsworthy. The study is based on articles from two major Swedish daily newspapers, Svenska Dagbladet and Dagens Nyheter.  The aim of our thesis is to establish how the environmental public debate as portrayed in the newspaper corresponds to the environmental discussion within the scientific (subject matter expert) field, that is taught by the academic institutions, or if the two materially differ. The environmental communication discourse at the academic institutions advocates ‘episodic’ formation as the driving force behind transformation of attitudes and behavioral preconceptions. This episodic formation is aimed at incentivizing change by creating intimacy to the incident by linking cause and consequence to the individual citizen instead of to society as a whole. The analysis consists of approximately 50 articles, all published in year 2010, and is based on CDA (Critical Discourse Analysis) where we sought to map out the discourses that frame the representation of environmental topics in these two daily newspapers.  The result shows that the newspapers account of environmental topics only weakly corresponds to the scientific account. The media representation mainly adopts a ‘thematic’ formation in which environmental topics are frequently approached by means of distancing itself or taking a broader and detached stance instead of a specific and attached link to the individual. The result thus shows that the newspapers discourse practice does not positively drive changes to attitudes and behaviors but rather reinforces the prevailing discourse and social posture in society. At the same time the analysis shows that the two newspapers form a forum where many different views and values are being voiced and where many different groups in society are represented in democratic spirit. Both supporting and inhibiting views are presented in this context. If the newspapers overall discourse practice promotes or inhibits transformation of the public’s environmental attitudes and behavior tends towards that ‘status quo’ is upheld at the expense of change. This despite, environmental topics are considered important by the Swedish public in general. 
author Andreasson Lindelöw, Josefin
Nilsson, Therese
author_facet Andreasson Lindelöw, Josefin
Nilsson, Therese
author_sort Andreasson Lindelöw, Josefin
title Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor
title_short Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor
title_full Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor
title_fullStr Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor
title_full_unstemmed Miljökommunikation i dagspressen : En diskursanalys av hur SvD och DN framställer miljöfrågor
title_sort miljökommunikation i dagspressen : en diskursanalys av hur svd och dn framställer miljöfrågor
publisher Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, SV
publishDate 2011
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-13791
work_keys_str_mv AT andreassonlindelowjosefin miljokommunikationidagspressenendiskursanalysavhursvdochdnframstallermiljofragor
AT nilssontherese miljokommunikationidagspressenendiskursanalysavhursvdochdnframstallermiljofragor
AT andreassonlindelowjosefin environmentalcommunicationinthedailypressadiscourseanalysisofsvdanddnportrayingtheenvironmentaldebate
AT nilssontherese environmentalcommunicationinthedailypressadiscourseanalysisofsvdanddnportrayingtheenvironmentaldebate
_version_ 1716523434772529152