The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures

Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to measure the effects of a specific technique used when assisting vaginal delivery and intended to decrease anal sphincter ruptures. After measuring the effects, the direct costs of a rupture were calculated and finally the cost impact of the intervention...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pirhonen, Laura
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Linnéuniversitetet, Ekonomihögskolan, ELNU 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-12188
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-12188
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-lnu-121882013-01-08T13:30:42ZThe effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter rupturesengPirhonen, LauraLinnéuniversitetet, Ekonomihögskolan, ELNU2011sphincter ruptureimpact evaluationtreatmentEconomicsNationalekonomiAim of the study: The aim of this study was to measure the effects of a specific technique used when assisting vaginal delivery and intended to decrease anal sphincter ruptures. After measuring the effects, the direct costs of a rupture were calculated and finally the cost impact of the intervention was evaluated. Data and model: Data from deliveries before the intervention, from 2004, and after the intervention, from 2008, were used and a pre-test – post-test evaluation design was applied. The dependent variable was the presence or absence of a rupture and because the variable is binary a logit model was used. The independent variables consisted of twelve different factors considered to affect the number of ruptures. When only accounting for ruptures alone 123 of 2900 deliveries resulted in a sphincter ruptures which equals 4.24% of the total amount of deliveries. Results: When not controlling for any of the independent variables, the risk of getting a rupture decreased by 3.8 percentage points when using the method while assisting a delivery. On the other hand, when controlling for all of the independent variables and the use of the method, the risk of getting a rupture decreased by 2.5 percentage points, from 4.24% to 1.74%. Two different models were tested, one with the variable weeks and one without the same variable, due to the presence of correlation in the model. The total cost of ruptures for a year was calculated as $84,429,254 without the implementation of the method and $34,647,854 with the implementation. Total cost savings for society with the implementation of the method would then be $49,677,045. Conclusions: Implementation of the method is highly recommendable for both society and the women involved. Not only does the number of ruptures decrease due to the method but also the costs for society decreases dramatically. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-12188application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic sphincter rupture
impact evaluation
treatment
Economics
Nationalekonomi
spellingShingle sphincter rupture
impact evaluation
treatment
Economics
Nationalekonomi
Pirhonen, Laura
The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
description Aim of the study: The aim of this study was to measure the effects of a specific technique used when assisting vaginal delivery and intended to decrease anal sphincter ruptures. After measuring the effects, the direct costs of a rupture were calculated and finally the cost impact of the intervention was evaluated. Data and model: Data from deliveries before the intervention, from 2004, and after the intervention, from 2008, were used and a pre-test – post-test evaluation design was applied. The dependent variable was the presence or absence of a rupture and because the variable is binary a logit model was used. The independent variables consisted of twelve different factors considered to affect the number of ruptures. When only accounting for ruptures alone 123 of 2900 deliveries resulted in a sphincter ruptures which equals 4.24% of the total amount of deliveries. Results: When not controlling for any of the independent variables, the risk of getting a rupture decreased by 3.8 percentage points when using the method while assisting a delivery. On the other hand, when controlling for all of the independent variables and the use of the method, the risk of getting a rupture decreased by 2.5 percentage points, from 4.24% to 1.74%. Two different models were tested, one with the variable weeks and one without the same variable, due to the presence of correlation in the model. The total cost of ruptures for a year was calculated as $84,429,254 without the implementation of the method and $34,647,854 with the implementation. Total cost savings for society with the implementation of the method would then be $49,677,045. Conclusions: Implementation of the method is highly recommendable for both society and the women involved. Not only does the number of ruptures decrease due to the method but also the costs for society decreases dramatically.
author Pirhonen, Laura
author_facet Pirhonen, Laura
author_sort Pirhonen, Laura
title The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
title_short The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
title_full The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
title_fullStr The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
title_full_unstemmed The effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
title_sort effects of implementing a method to reduce anal sphincter ruptures
publisher Linnéuniversitetet, Ekonomihögskolan, ELNU
publishDate 2011
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-12188
work_keys_str_mv AT pirhonenlaura theeffectsofimplementingamethodtoreduceanalsphincterruptures
AT pirhonenlaura effectsofimplementingamethodtoreduceanalsphincterruptures
_version_ 1716522198793977856