SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation

Current SME performance models suffer from a number of disadvantages. The models use intensively a business ratio approach, they look at SMEs as a homogenous group, they consider firms to be closed systems, they do not directly incorporate the impact of an enterprise’s innovation activities, and fin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abouzeedan, Adli
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling 2011
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-71349
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7393-219-6
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-71349
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-713492016-05-05T05:12:16ZSME Performance and Its Relationship to InnovationengAbouzeedan, AdliLinköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utvecklingLinköpings universitet, Tekniska högskolanLinköping : Linköping University Electronic Press2011SME performanceperformance evaluationfirm efficiencySIV modelinnovation capitalsystem capitalopen capitalbusiness modelsBusiness and economicsEkonomiCurrent SME performance models suffer from a number of disadvantages. The models use intensively a business ratio approach, they look at SMEs as a homogenous group, they consider firms to be closed systems, they do not directly incorporate the impact of an enterprise’s innovation activities, and finally they are complex and rely on sophisticated statistical refining methods making them unpractical to use by SME managers. There are four major challenges when one tries to build SME performance models that lack these deficiencies. The first challenge is that the desired performance evaluation model must optimally incorporate both quantitative and qualitative input. The second challenge is that the model must incorporate non-financial input parameters, such as firm size and age (among others), in the performance evaluation models. The third is that the model must consider the variety of SMEs as concerns their business sectors, nationalities, sizes, and ages. The final challenge is that the model must be able to utilize existing limited information available from the SMEs bookkeeping practices in an optimal way. The thesis addresses three questions related to constructing a better SMEperformance model, namely (1) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the existing models used in evaluating SME performance? (2) What characterizes a comprehensive model for measuring SME performance with acknowledgement of the firm’s innovation activities? (3) How can a firm’s innovation activities be enhanced in relation to the firm’s external environment? To construct a model that copes with these challenges, I used a literature-based selection of parameters as well as a theory-based selection. I used both a conceptual approach and an empirical approach to discuss and propose a model, the Survival Index Value (or SIV) model, as an alternative to the existing performance models for SMEs. The major contributions of this thesis to the field of SME performance can be summarized in three outcomes: the SIV model as a new model of SME performance evaluation, the ASPEM as a new tool for strategic utilization of SME performance models, and a new approach to account for innovation in relation to the external environment of the firm using the IBAM tool. The work adds to the theory of the firm, as it presents a new way of evaluating firm performance. It also contributes to bridging the theory of the firm to organizational theory, by elevating the significance of networking and its impact on SME efficiency. Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summaryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-71349urn:isbn:978-91-7393-219-6Linköping Studies in Science and Technology. Dissertations, 0345-7524 ; 1364application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic SME performance
performance evaluation
firm efficiency
SIV model
innovation capital
system capital
open capital
business models
Business and economics
Ekonomi
spellingShingle SME performance
performance evaluation
firm efficiency
SIV model
innovation capital
system capital
open capital
business models
Business and economics
Ekonomi
Abouzeedan, Adli
SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation
description Current SME performance models suffer from a number of disadvantages. The models use intensively a business ratio approach, they look at SMEs as a homogenous group, they consider firms to be closed systems, they do not directly incorporate the impact of an enterprise’s innovation activities, and finally they are complex and rely on sophisticated statistical refining methods making them unpractical to use by SME managers. There are four major challenges when one tries to build SME performance models that lack these deficiencies. The first challenge is that the desired performance evaluation model must optimally incorporate both quantitative and qualitative input. The second challenge is that the model must incorporate non-financial input parameters, such as firm size and age (among others), in the performance evaluation models. The third is that the model must consider the variety of SMEs as concerns their business sectors, nationalities, sizes, and ages. The final challenge is that the model must be able to utilize existing limited information available from the SMEs bookkeeping practices in an optimal way. The thesis addresses three questions related to constructing a better SMEperformance model, namely (1) What are the advantages and disadvantages of the existing models used in evaluating SME performance? (2) What characterizes a comprehensive model for measuring SME performance with acknowledgement of the firm’s innovation activities? (3) How can a firm’s innovation activities be enhanced in relation to the firm’s external environment? To construct a model that copes with these challenges, I used a literature-based selection of parameters as well as a theory-based selection. I used both a conceptual approach and an empirical approach to discuss and propose a model, the Survival Index Value (or SIV) model, as an alternative to the existing performance models for SMEs. The major contributions of this thesis to the field of SME performance can be summarized in three outcomes: the SIV model as a new model of SME performance evaluation, the ASPEM as a new tool for strategic utilization of SME performance models, and a new approach to account for innovation in relation to the external environment of the firm using the IBAM tool. The work adds to the theory of the firm, as it presents a new way of evaluating firm performance. It also contributes to bridging the theory of the firm to organizational theory, by elevating the significance of networking and its impact on SME efficiency.
author Abouzeedan, Adli
author_facet Abouzeedan, Adli
author_sort Abouzeedan, Adli
title SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation
title_short SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation
title_full SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation
title_fullStr SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation
title_full_unstemmed SME Performance and Its Relationship to Innovation
title_sort sme performance and its relationship to innovation
publisher Linköpings universitet, Institutionen för ekonomisk och industriell utveckling
publishDate 2011
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-71349
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7393-219-6
work_keys_str_mv AT abouzeedanadli smeperformanceanditsrelationshiptoinnovation
_version_ 1718260331669618688