Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation

This study contributes to an understanding of how coherence can be assigned or constructed by participants in authentic multiparty conversational interaction. Coherence is analysed as a type of organisation relevant for the making of meaning in situated interaction, but also in retrospect from a thi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Korolija, Natascha
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: Linköpings universitet, Tema Kommunikation 1998
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-10517
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:91-7219-161-9
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-10517
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-liu-105172013-01-08T13:08:22ZEpisodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversationengKorolija, NataschaLinköpings universitet, Tema KommunikationLinköpings universitet, Filosofiska fakultetenLinköping1998Coherenceepisodecontextmultiparty conversationactivity typecommunicative impairmentsradio talkdinner conversationSOCIAL SCIENCESSAMHÄLLSVETENSKAPThis study contributes to an understanding of how coherence can be assigned or constructed by participants in authentic multiparty conversational interaction. Coherence is analysed as a type of organisation relevant for the making of meaning in situated interaction, but also in retrospect from a third party's (or analyst's) perspective; it is both constructed and reconstructed. Important questions are: what makes multiparty talk hold together, what do a number of participants in conversation (have to) do in order to sustain coherence, and in what senses can multiparty conversations be argued to be coherent? A notion of episode is (re)introduced as a unit of natural social interaction, manifest at a structurally intermediate, or a global. level of conversation. The use of episode implies that coherence, a pragmatic phenomenon, steadily encompasses text, i.e. talk, context(s) and actions, and sense-making practices invoking contexts during the progression of interaction. This reflects the reciprocal relations between länguage, social interaction, and cognition. Also, a coding method of coherence has been developed, Topical Episode Analysis (abbreviated as TEA). The thesis explores the concept of episode and its place among units of interaction, and describes the episode structure and coherence-making in some specific activity types. The empirical material used, 24 multiparty conversations making up a total of 1500 episodes, consists of dinner conversations among peers, multi-generational family gatherings (involving aphasics), radio talk shows, and conversations recorded at a centre aimed for elderly people (with symptoms of dementia). In all conversations, conversing is a main activity. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses have been carried out. Results include the following points: (i) coherence in multiparty conversation can be regarded as a co-construction; (ii) coherence is accomplished through the invoking of contexts (cotext, situation, and background knowledge), implying that coherence is an attribute of activities in context and not only 'text'; (iii) coherence-making is the unmarked case in authentic conversation and incoherence or non-coherence appear to be theoretical constructs; (iv) coherence patterns are activityspecific; (v) coherence is multilayered, consisting of one local and several global levels; (vi) coherence is constructed through a division of communicative labour, suggesting that also people with communicative impairments contribute to coherence-making. Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summaryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-10517urn:isbn:91-7219-161-9Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 0282-9800 ; 171application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic Coherence
episode
context
multiparty conversation
activity type
communicative impairments
radio talk
dinner conversation
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
spellingShingle Coherence
episode
context
multiparty conversation
activity type
communicative impairments
radio talk
dinner conversation
SOCIAL SCIENCES
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP
Korolija, Natascha
Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
description This study contributes to an understanding of how coherence can be assigned or constructed by participants in authentic multiparty conversational interaction. Coherence is analysed as a type of organisation relevant for the making of meaning in situated interaction, but also in retrospect from a third party's (or analyst's) perspective; it is both constructed and reconstructed. Important questions are: what makes multiparty talk hold together, what do a number of participants in conversation (have to) do in order to sustain coherence, and in what senses can multiparty conversations be argued to be coherent? A notion of episode is (re)introduced as a unit of natural social interaction, manifest at a structurally intermediate, or a global. level of conversation. The use of episode implies that coherence, a pragmatic phenomenon, steadily encompasses text, i.e. talk, context(s) and actions, and sense-making practices invoking contexts during the progression of interaction. This reflects the reciprocal relations between länguage, social interaction, and cognition. Also, a coding method of coherence has been developed, Topical Episode Analysis (abbreviated as TEA). The thesis explores the concept of episode and its place among units of interaction, and describes the episode structure and coherence-making in some specific activity types. The empirical material used, 24 multiparty conversations making up a total of 1500 episodes, consists of dinner conversations among peers, multi-generational family gatherings (involving aphasics), radio talk shows, and conversations recorded at a centre aimed for elderly people (with symptoms of dementia). In all conversations, conversing is a main activity. Both qualitative and quantitative analyses have been carried out. Results include the following points: (i) coherence in multiparty conversation can be regarded as a co-construction; (ii) coherence is accomplished through the invoking of contexts (cotext, situation, and background knowledge), implying that coherence is an attribute of activities in context and not only 'text'; (iii) coherence-making is the unmarked case in authentic conversation and incoherence or non-coherence appear to be theoretical constructs; (iv) coherence patterns are activityspecific; (v) coherence is multilayered, consisting of one local and several global levels; (vi) coherence is constructed through a division of communicative labour, suggesting that also people with communicative impairments contribute to coherence-making.
author Korolija, Natascha
author_facet Korolija, Natascha
author_sort Korolija, Natascha
title Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
title_short Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
title_full Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
title_fullStr Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
title_full_unstemmed Episodes in talk : Constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
title_sort episodes in talk : constructing coherence in multiparty conversation
publisher Linköpings universitet, Tema Kommunikation
publishDate 1998
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-10517
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:91-7219-161-9
work_keys_str_mv AT korolijanatascha episodesintalkconstructingcoherenceinmultipartyconversation
_version_ 1716509921970749440