Evolution of the governance of projects within a program

In this thesis is discussed the evolution of the governance for the projects constituting a program. The different kinds of programs are first presented. A strong focus is given to the analysis of the actors of the governance and their role. A literature review of these characteristics for project a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Enjalbert, Tiphaine
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: KTH, Organisation och ledning 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-124602
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-124602
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-1246022013-10-17T04:52:14ZEvolution of the governance of projects within a programengEnjalbert, TiphaineKTH, Organisation och ledningEcole Centrale Paris2013ProgramProject GovernanceSteering CommitteeSponsorIn this thesis is discussed the evolution of the governance for the projects constituting a program. The different kinds of programs are first presented. A strong focus is given to the analysis of the actors of the governance and their role. A literature review of these characteristics for project and program governance shows the important role of the sponsor and the manager of the project. A case study of a global program in the luxury group LVMH has been realized for this thesis. This program, called Sapphire consists of the worldwide implementation of a Swiftnet platform in the affiliate of the group. This platform enables to realize secure payments and to receive account statements every day. One characteristics of the program implementation is that the mother houses implementation is handled by a project unit in the holding company. The implementations in the affiliates of the mother houses are then managed by the mother house itself. The main conclusions were: - The perspective of a first implementation is a governance one from the holding company toward the mother house. However, it shifts to a support perspective between the holding company and the mother house for the next implementation. - The project manager moves from the holding company to the mother house. The broker and the steward are thus in the mother house for the affiliate implementation. This practice enables LVMH to keep a small program team whose role becomes like the one of a program management office. - The project unit thus has first a managerial role which is transformed to a support role. However, it remains able to take decisions in case of potential failures The degree of generalizability of this study is finally addressed. This evolution of the governance could also be observed in other temporary programs like ERP implementations. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-124602application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Program
Project Governance
Steering Committee
Sponsor
spellingShingle Program
Project Governance
Steering Committee
Sponsor
Enjalbert, Tiphaine
Evolution of the governance of projects within a program
description In this thesis is discussed the evolution of the governance for the projects constituting a program. The different kinds of programs are first presented. A strong focus is given to the analysis of the actors of the governance and their role. A literature review of these characteristics for project and program governance shows the important role of the sponsor and the manager of the project. A case study of a global program in the luxury group LVMH has been realized for this thesis. This program, called Sapphire consists of the worldwide implementation of a Swiftnet platform in the affiliate of the group. This platform enables to realize secure payments and to receive account statements every day. One characteristics of the program implementation is that the mother houses implementation is handled by a project unit in the holding company. The implementations in the affiliates of the mother houses are then managed by the mother house itself. The main conclusions were: - The perspective of a first implementation is a governance one from the holding company toward the mother house. However, it shifts to a support perspective between the holding company and the mother house for the next implementation. - The project manager moves from the holding company to the mother house. The broker and the steward are thus in the mother house for the affiliate implementation. This practice enables LVMH to keep a small program team whose role becomes like the one of a program management office. - The project unit thus has first a managerial role which is transformed to a support role. However, it remains able to take decisions in case of potential failures The degree of generalizability of this study is finally addressed. This evolution of the governance could also be observed in other temporary programs like ERP implementations.
author Enjalbert, Tiphaine
author_facet Enjalbert, Tiphaine
author_sort Enjalbert, Tiphaine
title Evolution of the governance of projects within a program
title_short Evolution of the governance of projects within a program
title_full Evolution of the governance of projects within a program
title_fullStr Evolution of the governance of projects within a program
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of the governance of projects within a program
title_sort evolution of the governance of projects within a program
publisher KTH, Organisation och ledning
publishDate 2013
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-124602
work_keys_str_mv AT enjalberttiphaine evolutionofthegovernanceofprojectswithinaprogram
_version_ 1716604480288456705