Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis

How do additional data of the same and/or different type contribute to reducing model parameter and predictive uncertainties? This was the question addressed with two models – the HBV hydrological water balance model and the ICBM soil carbon balance model – that were used to investigate the usefulne...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Juston, John
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: KTH, Mark- och vattenteknik 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-12160
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7415-564-8
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-12160
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-121602013-01-08T13:10:46ZWater and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty AnalysisengJuston, JohnKTH, Mark- och vattenteknikStockholm : KTH Royal Institute of Technology2010Modelinguncertainty analysiswater balancecarbon balanceGLUEEnvironmental engineeringMiljöteknikHow do additional data of the same and/or different type contribute to reducing model parameter and predictive uncertainties? This was the question addressed with two models – the HBV hydrological water balance model and the ICBM soil carbon balance model – that were used to investigate the usefulness of the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method for calibrations and uncertainty analyses.  The GLUE method is based on threshold screening of Monte Carlo simulations using so-called informal likelihood measures and subjective acceptance criterion. This method is highly appropriate for model calibrations when errors are dominated by epistemic rather than stochastic uncertainties.  The informative value of data for model calibrations was investigated with numerous calibrations aimed at conditioning posterior parameter distributions and boundaries on model predictions.  The key results demonstrated examples of: 1) redundant information in daily time series of hydrological data; 2) diminishing returns in the value of continued time series data collections of the same type; 3) the potential value of additional data of a different type; 4) a means to effectively incorporate fuzzy information in model calibrations; and 5) the robustness of estimated parameter uncertainty for portability of a soil carbon model between and tropical climate zones.  The key to obtaining these insights lied in the methods of uncertainty analysis used to produce them.  A paradigm for selecting between formal and informal likelihood measures in uncertainty analysis is presented and discussed for future use within a context of climate related environmental modeling. QC 20110414Licentiate thesis, comprehensive summaryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-12160urn:isbn:978-91-7415-564-8Trita-LWR. LIC, 1650-8629 ; 2048application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Modeling
uncertainty analysis
water balance
carbon balance
GLUE
Environmental engineering
Miljöteknik
spellingShingle Modeling
uncertainty analysis
water balance
carbon balance
GLUE
Environmental engineering
Miljöteknik
Juston, John
Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
description How do additional data of the same and/or different type contribute to reducing model parameter and predictive uncertainties? This was the question addressed with two models – the HBV hydrological water balance model and the ICBM soil carbon balance model – that were used to investigate the usefulness of the Generalized Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE) method for calibrations and uncertainty analyses.  The GLUE method is based on threshold screening of Monte Carlo simulations using so-called informal likelihood measures and subjective acceptance criterion. This method is highly appropriate for model calibrations when errors are dominated by epistemic rather than stochastic uncertainties.  The informative value of data for model calibrations was investigated with numerous calibrations aimed at conditioning posterior parameter distributions and boundaries on model predictions.  The key results demonstrated examples of: 1) redundant information in daily time series of hydrological data; 2) diminishing returns in the value of continued time series data collections of the same type; 3) the potential value of additional data of a different type; 4) a means to effectively incorporate fuzzy information in model calibrations; and 5) the robustness of estimated parameter uncertainty for portability of a soil carbon model between and tropical climate zones.  The key to obtaining these insights lied in the methods of uncertainty analysis used to produce them.  A paradigm for selecting between formal and informal likelihood measures in uncertainty analysis is presented and discussed for future use within a context of climate related environmental modeling. === QC 20110414
author Juston, John
author_facet Juston, John
author_sort Juston, John
title Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
title_short Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
title_full Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
title_fullStr Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Water and Carbon Balance Modeling: Methods of Uncertainty Analysis
title_sort water and carbon balance modeling: methods of uncertainty analysis
publisher KTH, Mark- och vattenteknik
publishDate 2010
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-12160
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7415-564-8
work_keys_str_mv AT justonjohn waterandcarbonbalancemodelingmethodsofuncertaintyanalysis
_version_ 1716510957869465600