In Search of a Collective Form
One Project - Three Parts My thesis is of an investigative character, and the focus has not been to end up with a result that is a building, but rather a collected material from an ongoing discussion on collective form, through the process of sketching on a building. I see the whole project as divid...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
KTH, Arkitektur
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-118530 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-118530 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-1185302013-05-18T03:55:31ZIn Search of a Collective FormengKnochenhauer, MajaKTH, Arkitektur2013Collective FormResidential housingGroup formTheoryProcessSearchOne Project - Three Parts My thesis is of an investigative character, and the focus has not been to end up with a result that is a building, but rather a collected material from an ongoing discussion on collective form, through the process of sketching on a building. I see the whole project as divided into three different parts, that are equally important. Theory The theoretical context has its basis in theory that tries move away from the singular. I have particularly studied Fumihiko Makis “Investigations of Collective Form” and parts of Stan Allens writings on “Field Conditions”, and these texts have been generators for the project. Theory also regards texts and discussion that I have assimilated during the work, as well as my own theoretical reflections. Reading, writing and discussing are essentail parts of the project and has continuously affected the work. House I have chosen to focus on, and challenge, our notion of privacy and dwelling, and investigate in how we can live more collectively in our daily lives. I have sketched intuitively in physical models, and later on tried to push these free studies into a more complete building. The context is Scandinavia today, and I have taken advantage of a site in Oslo to exemplify a situation while developing the house. Process Parallell to theorizing and sketching I have kept a journal documenting the process. After finishing a model or sketch I have tried to evaluate it by discussing and writing about it, and stating how to move on from there. I never intended to stop the process at a certain date, but to continue the investigation as long as I could. This is once again another, quite outzoomed, context, that has to do with the architectural profession and how we can work, produce knowledge and investigate in different societal issues. Parts from the journal, that have been significant for the development of the house, are presented in this book. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-118530application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessapplication/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Collective Form Residential housing Group form Theory Process Search |
spellingShingle |
Collective Form Residential housing Group form Theory Process Search Knochenhauer, Maja In Search of a Collective Form |
description |
One Project - Three Parts My thesis is of an investigative character, and the focus has not been to end up with a result that is a building, but rather a collected material from an ongoing discussion on collective form, through the process of sketching on a building. I see the whole project as divided into three different parts, that are equally important. Theory The theoretical context has its basis in theory that tries move away from the singular. I have particularly studied Fumihiko Makis “Investigations of Collective Form” and parts of Stan Allens writings on “Field Conditions”, and these texts have been generators for the project. Theory also regards texts and discussion that I have assimilated during the work, as well as my own theoretical reflections. Reading, writing and discussing are essentail parts of the project and has continuously affected the work. House I have chosen to focus on, and challenge, our notion of privacy and dwelling, and investigate in how we can live more collectively in our daily lives. I have sketched intuitively in physical models, and later on tried to push these free studies into a more complete building. The context is Scandinavia today, and I have taken advantage of a site in Oslo to exemplify a situation while developing the house. Process Parallell to theorizing and sketching I have kept a journal documenting the process. After finishing a model or sketch I have tried to evaluate it by discussing and writing about it, and stating how to move on from there. I never intended to stop the process at a certain date, but to continue the investigation as long as I could. This is once again another, quite outzoomed, context, that has to do with the architectural profession and how we can work, produce knowledge and investigate in different societal issues. Parts from the journal, that have been significant for the development of the house, are presented in this book. |
author |
Knochenhauer, Maja |
author_facet |
Knochenhauer, Maja |
author_sort |
Knochenhauer, Maja |
title |
In Search of a Collective Form |
title_short |
In Search of a Collective Form |
title_full |
In Search of a Collective Form |
title_fullStr |
In Search of a Collective Form |
title_full_unstemmed |
In Search of a Collective Form |
title_sort |
in search of a collective form |
publisher |
KTH, Arkitektur |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-118530 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT knochenhauermaja insearchofacollectiveform |
_version_ |
1716585705522593792 |