Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures

Composite structures can lower the weight of an airliner significantly. Due to the higher process complexity and the high material cost, however, the low weight often comes with a significant increase in production cost. The application of cost-effective design strategies is one mean to meet this ch...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kaufmann, Markus
Format: Doctoral Thesis
Language:English
Published: KTH, Lättkonstruktioner 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-11482
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7415-500-6
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-11482
record_format oai_dc
collection NDLTD
language English
format Doctoral Thesis
sources NDLTD
topic aircraft structures
optimization
cost estimation
manufacturing cost
direct operating cost
multiobjective optimization
multidisciplinary optimization
composites
airframe design
Vehicle engineering
Farkostteknik
spellingShingle aircraft structures
optimization
cost estimation
manufacturing cost
direct operating cost
multiobjective optimization
multidisciplinary optimization
composites
airframe design
Vehicle engineering
Farkostteknik
Kaufmann, Markus
Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures
description Composite structures can lower the weight of an airliner significantly. Due to the higher process complexity and the high material cost, however, the low weight often comes with a significant increase in production cost. The application of cost-effective design strategies is one mean to meet this challenge. In this thesis, a simplified form of direct operating cost is suggested as a comparative value that in combination with multidisciplinary optimization enables the evaluation of a design solution in terms of cost and weight. The proposed cost optimization framework takes into account the manufacturing cost, the non-destructive testing cost and the lifetime fuel consumption based on the weight of the aircraft, thus using a simplified version of the direct operating cost as the objective function. The manufacturing cost can be estimated by means of different techniques. For the proposed optimization framework, feature-based parametric cost models prove to be most suitable. Paper A contains a parametric study in which a skin/stringer panel is optimized for a series of cost/weight ratios (weight penalties) and material configurations. The weight penalty (defined as the specific lifetime fuel burn) is dependent on the fuel consumption of the aircraft, the fuel price and the viewpoint of the optimizer. It is concluded that the ideal choice of the design solution is neither low-cost nor low-weight but rather a combination thereof. Paper B proposes the inclusion of non-destructive testing cost in the design process of composite components, and the adjustment of the design strength of each laminate according to inspection parameters. Hence, the scan pitch of the ultrasonic testing is regarded as a variable, representing an index for the guaranteed material quality. It is shown that the cost for non-destructive testing can be lowered if the quality level of the laminate is assigned and adjusted in an early design stage. In Paper C and Paper D the parameters of the manufacturing processes are upgraded during the cost optimization of the component. In Paper C, the framework is extended by the cost-efficient adaptation of parameters in order to reflect the situation when machining an aluminum component. For different weight penalties, the spar thickness and stringer geometry of the provided case study vary. In addition, another cutter is chosen with regard to the modified shape of the stringer. In Paper D, the methodology is extended to the draping of composite fabrics, thus optimizing not only the stacking layup, but also the draping strategy itself. As in the previous cases, the design alters for different settings of the weight penalty. In particular, one can see a distinct change in fiber layup between the minimum weight and the minimum cost solution. Paper E summarizes the work proposed in Papers A-D and provides a case study on a C-spar component. Five material systems are used for this case study and compared in terms of cost and weight. The case study shows the impact of the weight penalty, the material cost and the labor rate on the choice of the material system. For low weight penalties, for example, the aluminum spar is the most cost-effective solution. For high weight penalties, the RTM system is favorable. The paper also discusses shortcomings with the presented methodology and thereby opens up for future method developments. === QC 20100723 === European Framework Program 6, project ALCAS, AIP4-CT-2003-516092 === Nationella flygtekniska forskningsprogrammet (NFFP) 4, project kostnadseffektiv kompositstruktur (KEKS)
author Kaufmann, Markus
author_facet Kaufmann, Markus
author_sort Kaufmann, Markus
title Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures
title_short Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures
title_full Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures
title_fullStr Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures
title_full_unstemmed Cost Optimization of Aircraft Structures
title_sort cost optimization of aircraft structures
publisher KTH, Lättkonstruktioner
publishDate 2009
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-11482
http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:isbn:978-91-7415-500-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kaufmannmarkus costoptimizationofaircraftstructures
_version_ 1716509834663165952
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-114822013-01-08T13:08:25ZCost Optimization of Aircraft StructuresengKaufmann, MarkusKTH, LättkonstruktionerStockholm : KTH2009aircraft structuresoptimizationcost estimationmanufacturing costdirect operating costmultiobjective optimizationmultidisciplinary optimizationcompositesairframe designVehicle engineeringFarkostteknikComposite structures can lower the weight of an airliner significantly. Due to the higher process complexity and the high material cost, however, the low weight often comes with a significant increase in production cost. The application of cost-effective design strategies is one mean to meet this challenge. In this thesis, a simplified form of direct operating cost is suggested as a comparative value that in combination with multidisciplinary optimization enables the evaluation of a design solution in terms of cost and weight. The proposed cost optimization framework takes into account the manufacturing cost, the non-destructive testing cost and the lifetime fuel consumption based on the weight of the aircraft, thus using a simplified version of the direct operating cost as the objective function. The manufacturing cost can be estimated by means of different techniques. For the proposed optimization framework, feature-based parametric cost models prove to be most suitable. Paper A contains a parametric study in which a skin/stringer panel is optimized for a series of cost/weight ratios (weight penalties) and material configurations. The weight penalty (defined as the specific lifetime fuel burn) is dependent on the fuel consumption of the aircraft, the fuel price and the viewpoint of the optimizer. It is concluded that the ideal choice of the design solution is neither low-cost nor low-weight but rather a combination thereof. Paper B proposes the inclusion of non-destructive testing cost in the design process of composite components, and the adjustment of the design strength of each laminate according to inspection parameters. Hence, the scan pitch of the ultrasonic testing is regarded as a variable, representing an index for the guaranteed material quality. It is shown that the cost for non-destructive testing can be lowered if the quality level of the laminate is assigned and adjusted in an early design stage. In Paper C and Paper D the parameters of the manufacturing processes are upgraded during the cost optimization of the component. In Paper C, the framework is extended by the cost-efficient adaptation of parameters in order to reflect the situation when machining an aluminum component. For different weight penalties, the spar thickness and stringer geometry of the provided case study vary. In addition, another cutter is chosen with regard to the modified shape of the stringer. In Paper D, the methodology is extended to the draping of composite fabrics, thus optimizing not only the stacking layup, but also the draping strategy itself. As in the previous cases, the design alters for different settings of the weight penalty. In particular, one can see a distinct change in fiber layup between the minimum weight and the minimum cost solution. Paper E summarizes the work proposed in Papers A-D and provides a case study on a C-spar component. Five material systems are used for this case study and compared in terms of cost and weight. The case study shows the impact of the weight penalty, the material cost and the labor rate on the choice of the material system. For low weight penalties, for example, the aluminum spar is the most cost-effective solution. For high weight penalties, the RTM system is favorable. The paper also discusses shortcomings with the presented methodology and thereby opens up for future method developments. QC 20100723European Framework Program 6, project ALCAS, AIP4-CT-2003-516092Nationella flygtekniska forskningsprogrammet (NFFP) 4, project kostnadseffektiv kompositstruktur (KEKS)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summaryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-11482urn:isbn:978-91-7415-500-6Trita-AVE, 1651-7660 ; 83application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess