Reject Inference in Online Purchases

Abstract   As accurately as possible, creditors wish to determine if a potential debtor will repay the borrowed sum. To achieve this mathematical models known as credit scorecards quantifying the risk of default are used. In this study it is investigated whether the scorecard can be improved by usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mumm, Lennart
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: KTH, Matematisk statistik 2012
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102680
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-102680
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kth-1026802013-01-08T13:43:58ZReject Inference in Online PurchasesengMumm, LennartKTH, Matematisk statistik2012Abstract   As accurately as possible, creditors wish to determine if a potential debtor will repay the borrowed sum. To achieve this mathematical models known as credit scorecards quantifying the risk of default are used. In this study it is investigated whether the scorecard can be improved by using reject inference and thereby include the characteristics of the rejected population when refining the scorecard. The reject inference method used is parcelling. Logistic regression is used to estimate probability of default based on applicant characteristics. Two models, one with and one without reject inference, are compared using Gini coefficient and estimated profitability. The results yield that, when comparing the two models, the model with reject inference both has a slightly higher Gini coefficient as well a showing an increase in profitability. Thus, this study suggests that reject inference does improve the predictive power of the scorecard, but in order to verify the results additional testing on a larger calibration set is needed Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102680Trita-MAT, 1401-2286 ; 16application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
description Abstract   As accurately as possible, creditors wish to determine if a potential debtor will repay the borrowed sum. To achieve this mathematical models known as credit scorecards quantifying the risk of default are used. In this study it is investigated whether the scorecard can be improved by using reject inference and thereby include the characteristics of the rejected population when refining the scorecard. The reject inference method used is parcelling. Logistic regression is used to estimate probability of default based on applicant characteristics. Two models, one with and one without reject inference, are compared using Gini coefficient and estimated profitability. The results yield that, when comparing the two models, the model with reject inference both has a slightly higher Gini coefficient as well a showing an increase in profitability. Thus, this study suggests that reject inference does improve the predictive power of the scorecard, but in order to verify the results additional testing on a larger calibration set is needed
author Mumm, Lennart
spellingShingle Mumm, Lennart
Reject Inference in Online Purchases
author_facet Mumm, Lennart
author_sort Mumm, Lennart
title Reject Inference in Online Purchases
title_short Reject Inference in Online Purchases
title_full Reject Inference in Online Purchases
title_fullStr Reject Inference in Online Purchases
title_full_unstemmed Reject Inference in Online Purchases
title_sort reject inference in online purchases
publisher KTH, Matematisk statistik
publishDate 2012
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kth:diva-102680
work_keys_str_mv AT mummlennart rejectinferenceinonlinepurchases
_version_ 1716527420183412736