Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook

The purpose of this study is to examine how religion and the construction of new religious buildings are debated in social media. The study is based on two research questions concerning the main arguments about the mosque building in Karlstad and what kind of image of Muslims and Islam that exist. D...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruno, Elin
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap (from 2013) 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-66081
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kau-66081
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-kau-660812018-02-06T02:35:29ZReligionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebooksweBruno, ElinKarlstads universitet, Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap (from 2013)2018Islamophobia Mosque Social media Muslim Content analysisIslamofobi Moské Sociala medier Muslim InnehållsanalysReligious StudiesReligionsvetenskapThe purpose of this study is to examine how religion and the construction of new religious buildings are debated in social media. The study is based on two research questions concerning the main arguments about the mosque building in Karlstad and what kind of image of Muslims and Islam that exist. Data were collected from two Facebook-groups, Ja till moské i Karlstad and Nej tack till moské i Karlstad and analyzed and categorised with a content analysis and image analysis. The theory of the study rests on Mattias Gardell’s definition of Islamophobia. The theory also includes Klas Borell’s definition of NIMBY and the concept of cyber-Islamophobia by Göran Larsson. The result showed that most arguments concerning the building of the mosque were based on arguments of freedom of religion. The positive arguments claimed a mosque was good for the city and the freedom of religion. The arguments that were negative claimed a mosque would be a threat to the freedom of religion, since they claimed Islam is violent and that the location for the mosque should be used for something better (housing, school, activities, etc.). Muslims and Islam i portrayed mostly negative and stereotyped. However, these stereotypes are contradicted by Muslims who claims their religion to be peaceful and respectful.the result showed that the arguments overall was Islamophobic even though some arguments in favor to defend that Islam exist. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-66081application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Islamophobia Mosque Social media Muslim Content analysis
Islamofobi Moské Sociala medier Muslim Innehållsanalys
Religious Studies
Religionsvetenskap
spellingShingle Islamophobia Mosque Social media Muslim Content analysis
Islamofobi Moské Sociala medier Muslim Innehållsanalys
Religious Studies
Religionsvetenskap
Bruno, Elin
Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
description The purpose of this study is to examine how religion and the construction of new religious buildings are debated in social media. The study is based on two research questions concerning the main arguments about the mosque building in Karlstad and what kind of image of Muslims and Islam that exist. Data were collected from two Facebook-groups, Ja till moské i Karlstad and Nej tack till moské i Karlstad and analyzed and categorised with a content analysis and image analysis. The theory of the study rests on Mattias Gardell’s definition of Islamophobia. The theory also includes Klas Borell’s definition of NIMBY and the concept of cyber-Islamophobia by Göran Larsson. The result showed that most arguments concerning the building of the mosque were based on arguments of freedom of religion. The positive arguments claimed a mosque was good for the city and the freedom of religion. The arguments that were negative claimed a mosque would be a threat to the freedom of religion, since they claimed Islam is violent and that the location for the mosque should be used for something better (housing, school, activities, etc.). Muslims and Islam i portrayed mostly negative and stereotyped. However, these stereotypes are contradicted by Muslims who claims their religion to be peaceful and respectful.the result showed that the arguments overall was Islamophobic even though some arguments in favor to defend that Islam exist.
author Bruno, Elin
author_facet Bruno, Elin
author_sort Bruno, Elin
title Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
title_short Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
title_full Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
title_fullStr Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
title_full_unstemmed Religionens synlighet i sociala medier : En innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
title_sort religionens synlighet i sociala medier : en innehållsanalys om moskédebatter på facebook
publisher Karlstads universitet, Fakulteten för humaniora och samhällsvetenskap (from 2013)
publishDate 2018
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-66081
work_keys_str_mv AT brunoelin religionenssynlighetisocialamediereninnehallsanalysommoskedebatterpafacebook
_version_ 1718613386722279424