An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden

The New Public Management (NPM) has made the public sector go through a period of privatization and externalization which has affected the method of accounting of municipalities, from cash to accrual accounting. The NPM has also resulted in a mix of private and public sector that makes the matter of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Karlsson, Johannes, Nilsson, Mathias
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för Hälsa och Samhälle 2010
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-6867
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hkr-6867
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hkr-68672013-01-08T13:26:01ZAn alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of SwedenengKarlsson, JohannesNilsson, MathiasHögskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för Hälsa och SamhälleHögskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för Hälsa och Samhälle2010ConsolidationSwedish MunicipalitiesGovernment Business EnterprisesSwedish Council of Municipal AccountingRKR 8.2The New Public Management (NPM) has made the public sector go through a period of privatization and externalization which has affected the method of accounting of municipalities, from cash to accrual accounting. The NPM has also resulted in a mix of private and public sector that makes the matter of consolidation of municipal groups complicated because of the municipalities’ use of public sector accounting and the municipal companies’ use of private sector accounting.   In Sweden, the Swedish Council of Municipal Accounting (SCMA) has the task of producing recommendations concerning the accounting of municipalities so that the goal of the “true and fair” view of the municipalities’ is met. In 2009, the SCMA produced the recommendation 8.2 (RKR 8.2) containing guidelines concerning consolidation of the municipal group. The purpose of this article is to investigate the use of RKR 8.2 and what kind of municipality is more inclined to use the recommendation. This question shall be answered by a quantitative, document study of the annual reports of Swedish municipalities from 2009 together with the Stakeholder Theory and the Positive Accounting Theory.   The result of the article shows that the municipalities that are more inclined to implement the RKR 8.2 and to implement it to a larger degree are municipalities of a larger size, with a high performance, with a high tax income and with large municipal companies.   Still, the document study shows that only 43 out of 239 municipalities have implemented the recommendation. To increase the implementation and use of the recommendations of SCMA we suggest merger of municipalities as larger municipalities, for different reasons, have implemented the recommendation to a larger degree than smaller ones. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-6867application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language English
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Consolidation
Swedish Municipalities
Government Business Enterprises
Swedish Council of Municipal Accounting
RKR 8.2
spellingShingle Consolidation
Swedish Municipalities
Government Business Enterprises
Swedish Council of Municipal Accounting
RKR 8.2
Karlsson, Johannes
Nilsson, Mathias
An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden
description The New Public Management (NPM) has made the public sector go through a period of privatization and externalization which has affected the method of accounting of municipalities, from cash to accrual accounting. The NPM has also resulted in a mix of private and public sector that makes the matter of consolidation of municipal groups complicated because of the municipalities’ use of public sector accounting and the municipal companies’ use of private sector accounting.   In Sweden, the Swedish Council of Municipal Accounting (SCMA) has the task of producing recommendations concerning the accounting of municipalities so that the goal of the “true and fair” view of the municipalities’ is met. In 2009, the SCMA produced the recommendation 8.2 (RKR 8.2) containing guidelines concerning consolidation of the municipal group. The purpose of this article is to investigate the use of RKR 8.2 and what kind of municipality is more inclined to use the recommendation. This question shall be answered by a quantitative, document study of the annual reports of Swedish municipalities from 2009 together with the Stakeholder Theory and the Positive Accounting Theory.   The result of the article shows that the municipalities that are more inclined to implement the RKR 8.2 and to implement it to a larger degree are municipalities of a larger size, with a high performance, with a high tax income and with large municipal companies.   Still, the document study shows that only 43 out of 239 municipalities have implemented the recommendation. To increase the implementation and use of the recommendations of SCMA we suggest merger of municipalities as larger municipalities, for different reasons, have implemented the recommendation to a larger degree than smaller ones.
author Karlsson, Johannes
Nilsson, Mathias
author_facet Karlsson, Johannes
Nilsson, Mathias
author_sort Karlsson, Johannes
title An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden
title_short An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden
title_full An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden
title_fullStr An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden
title_full_unstemmed An alternative approach to IPSAS consolidation : The case of Sweden
title_sort alternative approach to ipsas consolidation : the case of sweden
publisher Högskolan Kristianstad, Sektionen för Hälsa och Samhälle
publishDate 2010
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hkr:diva-6867
work_keys_str_mv AT karlssonjohannes analternativeapproachtoipsasconsolidationthecaseofsweden
AT nilssonmathias analternativeapproachtoipsasconsolidationthecaseofsweden
AT karlssonjohannes alternativeapproachtoipsasconsolidationthecaseofsweden
AT nilssonmathias alternativeapproachtoipsasconsolidationthecaseofsweden
_version_ 1716519949424394240