Data mining file sharing metadata : A comparison between Random Forests Classificiation and Bayesian Networks

In this comparative study based on experimentation it is demonstrated that the two evaluated machine learning techniques, Bayesian networks and random forests, have similar predictive power in the domain of classifying torrents on BitTorrent file sharing networks. This work was performed in two step...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Petersson, Andreas
Format: Others
Language:English
Published: Högskolan i Skövde, Institutionen för informationsteknologi 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-11180
Description
Summary:In this comparative study based on experimentation it is demonstrated that the two evaluated machine learning techniques, Bayesian networks and random forests, have similar predictive power in the domain of classifying torrents on BitTorrent file sharing networks. This work was performed in two steps. First, a literature analysis was performed to gain insight into how the two techniques work and what types of attacks exist against BitTorrent file sharing networks. After the literature analysis, an experiment was performed to evaluate the accuracy of the two techniques. The results show no significant advantage of using one algorithm over the other when only considering accuracy. However, ease of use lies in Random forests’ favour because the technique requires little pre-processing of the data and still generates accurate results with few false positives.