Den andra upplysningen : En idékritisk studie av den vetenskapliga humanismen

This 15 point level essay intends to carry out an ideological critic of the scientific humanism; the main question the essay asks is: do the Humanists practice a rational dialog. In able to find an answer to this question have I developed an analyze scheme that show what the skilful demagogue should...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Gill Michael, Lucas
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Högskolan i Kalmar, Humanvetenskapliga institutionen 2008
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hik:diva-181
Description
Summary:This 15 point level essay intends to carry out an ideological critic of the scientific humanism; the main question the essay asks is: do the Humanists practice a rational dialog. In able to find an answer to this question have I developed an analyze scheme that show what the skilful demagogue should avoid, if he have an interest in practicing a rational dialog. The essay shows that, when it comes to debating their most important issues, the Humanist does not practice a rational dialog. The Humanists deny that other forms of humanism than the one they practice exists, according to their beliefs´ humanism must contain an atheistic attitude to the world. When it comes to the Humanists debates concerning religion they accentuate those parts of the bible that they believe is destructive for mankind, these arguments have no rele-vance and are therefore not rational.