EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of different database management systems (DBMS) have been performed in order to identify and compare those which address requirements such as public domain licensing, free of charge, high product support, ADO .NET Entity Framework compatibility, good performance...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för Informationsvetenskap, Data– och Elektroteknik (IDE)
2010
|
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-6255 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hh-6255 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hh-62552013-01-08T13:49:37ZEVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMSengLiang, XingLu, YongyuHögskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för Informationsvetenskap, Data– och Elektroteknik (IDE)Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för Informationsvetenskap, Data– och Elektroteknik (IDE)2010Qualitative and quantitative analysis of different database management systems (DBMS) have been performed in order to identify and compare those which address requirements such as public domain licensing, free of charge, high product support, ADO .NET Entity Framework compatibility, good performance, referential integrity, among others. More than 20 existing database management systems have been selected as possible candidates. Qualitative analysis reduced that number to 4 candidates DBMSs (PostgreSQL, SQLite, Firebird and MySQL). Quantitative analysis has been used to test the performance of these 4 DBMSs while performing the most common structured query language (SQL) data manipulation statements (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE and SELECT). Referential integrity and easy to install were also evaluated for these 4 DBMSs. As results, Firebird is the most suitable DBMS which best addressed all desired requirements. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-6255application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
English |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
description |
Qualitative and quantitative analysis of different database management systems (DBMS) have been performed in order to identify and compare those which address requirements such as public domain licensing, free of charge, high product support, ADO .NET Entity Framework compatibility, good performance, referential integrity, among others. More than 20 existing database management systems have been selected as possible candidates. Qualitative analysis reduced that number to 4 candidates DBMSs (PostgreSQL, SQLite, Firebird and MySQL). Quantitative analysis has been used to test the performance of these 4 DBMSs while performing the most common structured query language (SQL) data manipulation statements (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE and SELECT). Referential integrity and easy to install were also evaluated for these 4 DBMSs. As results, Firebird is the most suitable DBMS which best addressed all desired requirements. |
author |
Liang, Xing Lu, Yongyu |
spellingShingle |
Liang, Xing Lu, Yongyu EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
author_facet |
Liang, Xing Lu, Yongyu |
author_sort |
Liang, Xing |
title |
EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
title_short |
EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
title_full |
EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
title_fullStr |
EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
title_full_unstemmed |
EVALUATION OF DATABASE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS |
title_sort |
evaluation of database management systems |
publisher |
Högskolan i Halmstad, Sektionen för Informationsvetenskap, Data– och Elektroteknik (IDE) |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-6255 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT liangxing evaluationofdatabasemanagementsystems AT luyongyu evaluationofdatabasemanagementsystems |
_version_ |
1716529744451731456 |