Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11
This essay will address whether the school has gone from being a collectivist-oriented to anindividualist-oriented school. By studying the curricula LGY70, LPF94 and LGY11 for uppersecondary school and studying how the concept group expresses itself in the different curricula.The study is based on a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | Swedish |
Published: |
Högskolan i Halmstad, Akademin för lärande, humaniora och samhälle
2019
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-38960 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hh-38960 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hh-389602019-03-15T05:58:42ZKollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11sweEricsson, FredricHögskolan i Halmstad, Akademin för lärande, humaniora och samhälle2019LäroplanLGY11LPF94LGY70SkolaKollektivismIndividualismLearningLärandeHistoryHistoriaThis essay will address whether the school has gone from being a collectivist-oriented to anindividualist-oriented school. By studying the curricula LGY70, LPF94 and LGY11 for uppersecondary school and studying how the concept group expresses itself in the different curricula.The study is based on a qualitative concept analysis model by Walker and Avant's seven differentsteps to analyze concept. The term group will be explained and discussed in the paper to create anunderstanding of what a group is and its different definitions. After this, group theories will beaddressed in relation to the concept group, then this will be applied in relation to the curricula.In each curriculum I will give an overall history when the curricula came to be applied in society.This is done to better understand the time and spirit of the time. In each curriculum I will give anoverall history when the curricula came to be applied in society. This is done to better understandthe time and spirit of the time.What I have come up with is that the school has gone from being collectivist to individualistic.This is because the curricula change and are revised to create the conditions for an increasinglychanging society. This is a must for the school to prepare the students for an ever-changing society.Groups are not as important, but it is the individual and its growth and learning that have come intofocus. For each curriculum, more and more valid groups and group identities have been revisedaway. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-38960application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
Swedish |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Läroplan LGY11 LPF94 LGY70 Skola Kollektivism Individualism Learning Lärande History Historia |
spellingShingle |
Läroplan LGY11 LPF94 LGY70 Skola Kollektivism Individualism Learning Lärande History Historia Ericsson, Fredric Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11 |
description |
This essay will address whether the school has gone from being a collectivist-oriented to anindividualist-oriented school. By studying the curricula LGY70, LPF94 and LGY11 for uppersecondary school and studying how the concept group expresses itself in the different curricula.The study is based on a qualitative concept analysis model by Walker and Avant's seven differentsteps to analyze concept. The term group will be explained and discussed in the paper to create anunderstanding of what a group is and its different definitions. After this, group theories will beaddressed in relation to the concept group, then this will be applied in relation to the curricula.In each curriculum I will give an overall history when the curricula came to be applied in society.This is done to better understand the time and spirit of the time. In each curriculum I will give anoverall history when the curricula came to be applied in society. This is done to better understandthe time and spirit of the time.What I have come up with is that the school has gone from being collectivist to individualistic.This is because the curricula change and are revised to create the conditions for an increasinglychanging society. This is a must for the school to prepare the students for an ever-changing society.Groups are not as important, but it is the individual and its growth and learning that have come intofocus. For each curriculum, more and more valid groups and group identities have been revisedaway. |
author |
Ericsson, Fredric |
author_facet |
Ericsson, Fredric |
author_sort |
Ericsson, Fredric |
title |
Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11 |
title_short |
Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11 |
title_full |
Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11 |
title_fullStr |
Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11 |
title_full_unstemmed |
Kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : En läroplansanalys på LGY70, LPF94 och LGY11 |
title_sort |
kollektivism eller individualism i skolan? : en läroplansanalys på lgy70, lpf94 och lgy11 |
publisher |
Högskolan i Halmstad, Akademin för lärande, humaniora och samhälle |
publishDate |
2019 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-38960 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ericssonfredric kollektivismellerindividualismiskolanenlaroplansanalyspalgy70lpf94ochlgy11 |
_version_ |
1719003348750827520 |