Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?

The aim of this Master’s thesis is to investigate if the library can be a real partner for researchers in managing and dealing with their research information. In this study, six researchers have been interviewed about their problems with information management. This study uses the method Critical I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Egevad, Per
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-19321
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-19321
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-193212019-05-01T05:15:35ZProbleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?sweAn inventory of problems found in researchers’ information management processes : A question for the Library?Egevad, PerHögskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / BibliotekshögskolanUniversity of Borås/Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS)2009critical incident technique (cit)kritisk incident metodinformationshanteringforskares primärprocesserforskarserviceklusteranalysvetenskapliga bibliotekSocial SciencesSamhällsvetenskapThe aim of this Master’s thesis is to investigate if the library can be a real partner for researchers in managing and dealing with their research information. In this study, six researchers have been interviewed about their problems with information management. This study uses the method Critical Incident Technique for the interviews with the researchers. This method focuses mainly on problems and what happens around those problems. The interview results have been prepared with automatic clustering and analysed with the help of a theoretical model from Minnesota University Library. This is a model of the scholarly research process described in four overlapping areas: 1) Discover, 2) Gather, 3) Create and 4) Share. The studies result gives that there seems to be no problem with accessing full text information, the problem is rather narrowing down the search to get enough time to read it all. The researchers do not find any search skills in the library that match their own search skills. On the question if the library works well as a partner, the answer in this study is no. The researchers do not see the library as a partner in working with research information, but only as a supplier of documents. When they need assistance, they turn to colleagues, students, email, and as a last resort, the library. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-19321Local 2320/4826Magisteruppsats i biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap vid institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap, 1654-0247 ; 2009:8application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic critical incident technique (cit)
kritisk incident metod
informationshantering
forskares primärprocesser
forskarservice
klusteranalys
vetenskapliga bibliotek
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
spellingShingle critical incident technique (cit)
kritisk incident metod
informationshantering
forskares primärprocesser
forskarservice
klusteranalys
vetenskapliga bibliotek
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
Egevad, Per
Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?
description The aim of this Master’s thesis is to investigate if the library can be a real partner for researchers in managing and dealing with their research information. In this study, six researchers have been interviewed about their problems with information management. This study uses the method Critical Incident Technique for the interviews with the researchers. This method focuses mainly on problems and what happens around those problems. The interview results have been prepared with automatic clustering and analysed with the help of a theoretical model from Minnesota University Library. This is a model of the scholarly research process described in four overlapping areas: 1) Discover, 2) Gather, 3) Create and 4) Share. The studies result gives that there seems to be no problem with accessing full text information, the problem is rather narrowing down the search to get enough time to read it all. The researchers do not find any search skills in the library that match their own search skills. On the question if the library works well as a partner, the answer in this study is no. The researchers do not see the library as a partner in working with research information, but only as a supplier of documents. When they need assistance, they turn to colleagues, students, email, and as a last resort, the library.
author Egevad, Per
author_facet Egevad, Per
author_sort Egevad, Per
title Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?
title_short Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?
title_full Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?
title_fullStr Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?
title_full_unstemmed Probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : En fråga för biblioteket?
title_sort probleminventering av några forskares informationshantering : en fråga för biblioteket?
publisher Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan
publishDate 2009
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-19321
work_keys_str_mv AT egevadper probleminventeringavnagraforskaresinformationshanteringenfragaforbiblioteket
AT egevadper aninventoryofproblemsfoundinresearchersinformationmanagementprocessesaquestionforthelibrary
_version_ 1719022783796609024