”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
Should libraries first and foremost be a source of free informationwhere the citizens can find whatever information they want, or dothe librarians have a responsibility for what kind of works theypresent to people on their shelves? A wild debate broke out inSwedish media in September 2012, after the...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | Swedish |
Published: |
Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-17044 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-17044 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-170442019-05-01T05:14:32Z”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebattenswe”The libraries can´t keep weeding out” a discourse analysis of the Tintin debateSimonsson, MariaHögskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / BibliotekshögskolanUniversity of Borås/Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS)2013Laclau och MouffecensurstereotyperTintindiskursanalysyttrandefriheturvalsarbetefolkbibliotekSocial SciencesSamhällsvetenskapShould libraries first and foremost be a source of free informationwhere the citizens can find whatever information they want, or dothe librarians have a responsibility for what kind of works theypresent to people on their shelves? A wild debate broke out inSwedish media in September 2012, after the artistic leader ofKulturhuset in Stockholm; Behrang Miri decided to weed out allthe Tintin albums from the children´s library Tiotretton. Hewanted to start a debate on stereotypes in children´s fiction, andwhat damage they do to children who face them. The purpose ofthe thesis is to carry out a discourse analysis of this media debate,and to identify the different views that are expressed on thedemocratic mission of the libraries, what media they shouldpresent. The method and theory is based on the discourse theory ofErnesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and their concepts are used toarrange the analysis around certain themes that build up twodifferent discourses; “Freedom of information discourse” and the“Weeding out discourse”.The two main questions are: What views of the public librariesselection of works are expressed in the Tintin debate in Tiotretton,and how do the views relate to each other? What concepts arespecific for the debate, and what meanings do they get in thesedifferent views?In the concluding chapter I discuss which consequences theseopposing opinions can have for the future selection processes ofthe library. Program: BibliotekarieStudent thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-17044Local 2320/12156Kandidatuppsats, ; 2012:85application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
Swedish |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
Laclau och Mouffe censur stereotyper Tintin diskursanalys yttrandefrihet urvalsarbete folkbibliotek Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap |
spellingShingle |
Laclau och Mouffe censur stereotyper Tintin diskursanalys yttrandefrihet urvalsarbete folkbibliotek Social Sciences Samhällsvetenskap Simonsson, Maria ”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten |
description |
Should libraries first and foremost be a source of free informationwhere the citizens can find whatever information they want, or dothe librarians have a responsibility for what kind of works theypresent to people on their shelves? A wild debate broke out inSwedish media in September 2012, after the artistic leader ofKulturhuset in Stockholm; Behrang Miri decided to weed out allthe Tintin albums from the children´s library Tiotretton. Hewanted to start a debate on stereotypes in children´s fiction, andwhat damage they do to children who face them. The purpose ofthe thesis is to carry out a discourse analysis of this media debate,and to identify the different views that are expressed on thedemocratic mission of the libraries, what media they shouldpresent. The method and theory is based on the discourse theory ofErnesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and their concepts are used toarrange the analysis around certain themes that build up twodifferent discourses; “Freedom of information discourse” and the“Weeding out discourse”.The two main questions are: What views of the public librariesselection of works are expressed in the Tintin debate in Tiotretton,and how do the views relate to each other? What concepts arespecific for the debate, and what meanings do they get in thesedifferent views?In the concluding chapter I discuss which consequences theseopposing opinions can have for the future selection processes ofthe library. === Program: Bibliotekarie |
author |
Simonsson, Maria |
author_facet |
Simonsson, Maria |
author_sort |
Simonsson, Maria |
title |
”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten |
title_short |
”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten |
title_full |
”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten |
title_fullStr |
”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten |
title_full_unstemmed |
”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten |
title_sort |
”biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av tintindebatten |
publisher |
Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-17044 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT simonssonmaria bibliotekenkanintehallapaattrensautendiskursanalysavtintindebatten AT simonssonmaria thelibrariescantkeepweedingoutadiscourseanalysisofthetintindebate |
_version_ |
1719021843830013952 |