”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten

Should libraries first and foremost be a source of free informationwhere the citizens can find whatever information they want, or dothe librarians have a responsibility for what kind of works theypresent to people on their shelves? A wild debate broke out inSwedish media in September 2012, after the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Simonsson, Maria
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan 2013
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-17044
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-17044
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-170442019-05-01T05:14:32Z”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebattenswe”The libraries can´t keep weeding out” a discourse analysis of the Tintin debateSimonsson, MariaHögskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / BibliotekshögskolanUniversity of Borås/Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS)2013Laclau och MouffecensurstereotyperTintindiskursanalysyttrandefriheturvalsarbetefolkbibliotekSocial SciencesSamhällsvetenskapShould libraries first and foremost be a source of free informationwhere the citizens can find whatever information they want, or dothe librarians have a responsibility for what kind of works theypresent to people on their shelves? A wild debate broke out inSwedish media in September 2012, after the artistic leader ofKulturhuset in Stockholm; Behrang Miri decided to weed out allthe Tintin albums from the children´s library Tiotretton. Hewanted to start a debate on stereotypes in children´s fiction, andwhat damage they do to children who face them. The purpose ofthe thesis is to carry out a discourse analysis of this media debate,and to identify the different views that are expressed on thedemocratic mission of the libraries, what media they shouldpresent. The method and theory is based on the discourse theory ofErnesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and their concepts are used toarrange the analysis around certain themes that build up twodifferent discourses; “Freedom of information discourse” and the“Weeding out discourse”.The two main questions are: What views of the public librariesselection of works are expressed in the Tintin debate in Tiotretton,and how do the views relate to each other? What concepts arespecific for the debate, and what meanings do they get in thesedifferent views?In the concluding chapter I discuss which consequences theseopposing opinions can have for the future selection processes ofthe library. Program: BibliotekarieStudent thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-17044Local 2320/12156Kandidatuppsats, ; 2012:85application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic Laclau och Mouffe
censur
stereotyper
Tintin
diskursanalys
yttrandefrihet
urvalsarbete
folkbibliotek
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
spellingShingle Laclau och Mouffe
censur
stereotyper
Tintin
diskursanalys
yttrandefrihet
urvalsarbete
folkbibliotek
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
Simonsson, Maria
”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
description Should libraries first and foremost be a source of free informationwhere the citizens can find whatever information they want, or dothe librarians have a responsibility for what kind of works theypresent to people on their shelves? A wild debate broke out inSwedish media in September 2012, after the artistic leader ofKulturhuset in Stockholm; Behrang Miri decided to weed out allthe Tintin albums from the children´s library Tiotretton. Hewanted to start a debate on stereotypes in children´s fiction, andwhat damage they do to children who face them. The purpose ofthe thesis is to carry out a discourse analysis of this media debate,and to identify the different views that are expressed on thedemocratic mission of the libraries, what media they shouldpresent. The method and theory is based on the discourse theory ofErnesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe and their concepts are used toarrange the analysis around certain themes that build up twodifferent discourses; “Freedom of information discourse” and the“Weeding out discourse”.The two main questions are: What views of the public librariesselection of works are expressed in the Tintin debate in Tiotretton,and how do the views relate to each other? What concepts arespecific for the debate, and what meanings do they get in thesedifferent views?In the concluding chapter I discuss which consequences theseopposing opinions can have for the future selection processes ofthe library. === Program: Bibliotekarie
author Simonsson, Maria
author_facet Simonsson, Maria
author_sort Simonsson, Maria
title ”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
title_short ”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
title_full ”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
title_fullStr ”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
title_full_unstemmed ”Biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av Tintindebatten
title_sort ”biblioteken kan inte hålla på att rensa ut” en diskursanalys av tintindebatten
publisher Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan
publishDate 2013
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-17044
work_keys_str_mv AT simonssonmaria bibliotekenkanintehallapaattrensautendiskursanalysavtintindebatten
AT simonssonmaria thelibrariescantkeepweedingoutadiscourseanalysisofthetintindebate
_version_ 1719021843830013952