Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning

The purpose of this thesis is to get an improved understanding of what the bases for relevance are, when people in real information need situations make relevance judgements. In order to meet this purpose, an investigation based on research literature is performed. Four types of relevance are in...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sjöstrand, Iréne
Format: Others
Language:Swedish
Published: Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-16293
id ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-16293
record_format oai_dc
spelling ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-hb-162932019-05-01T05:14:08ZVad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökningsweWhat are the bases for users relevance judgements? : An investigation based on literatureSjöstrand, IréneHögskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / BibliotekshögskolanUniversity College of Borås. Swedish School of Library and Information Science (SSLIS)2003library and information sciencebiblioteks- och informationsvetenskapSocial SciencesSamhällsvetenskapThe purpose of this thesis is to get an improved understanding of what the bases for relevance are, when people in real information need situations make relevance judgements. In order to meet this purpose, an investigation based on research literature is performed. Four types of relevance are investigated: topical or subject relevance, cognitive relevance or pertinence, situational relevance or utility, and socio-cognitive relevance. The investigation also deals with users relevance criteria identified in fourteen empirical studies, in which the users are adults and engaged in oral, textual, and multimedia information retrieval. Finally, the connections between the user criteria found and the types of relevance are discussed. The result shows that the user criteria that are brought together with topical relevance are few and fairly alike. The user criteria that are brought together with cognitive relevance and with situational relevance are much more numerous and of many different kinds. The criteria assigned to these two types of relevance are divided into groups. Among the criteria that are assigned to cognitive relevance, a part of the situational relevance criteria are to be found as well, depending on the catch-all nature of situational relevance. No connections between the user criteria and socio-cognitive relevance are found. The result indicates that relevance can be considered as a system and the relevance judgement as a process in which there are certain determined stages. Uppsatsnivå: DStudent thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-16293Local 2320/1022Magisteruppsats i biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap vid Bibliotekshögskolan/Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap, 1404-0891 ; 2003:108application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
collection NDLTD
language Swedish
format Others
sources NDLTD
topic library and information science
biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
spellingShingle library and information science
biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap
Social Sciences
Samhällsvetenskap
Sjöstrand, Iréne
Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning
description The purpose of this thesis is to get an improved understanding of what the bases for relevance are, when people in real information need situations make relevance judgements. In order to meet this purpose, an investigation based on research literature is performed. Four types of relevance are investigated: topical or subject relevance, cognitive relevance or pertinence, situational relevance or utility, and socio-cognitive relevance. The investigation also deals with users relevance criteria identified in fourteen empirical studies, in which the users are adults and engaged in oral, textual, and multimedia information retrieval. Finally, the connections between the user criteria found and the types of relevance are discussed. The result shows that the user criteria that are brought together with topical relevance are few and fairly alike. The user criteria that are brought together with cognitive relevance and with situational relevance are much more numerous and of many different kinds. The criteria assigned to these two types of relevance are divided into groups. Among the criteria that are assigned to cognitive relevance, a part of the situational relevance criteria are to be found as well, depending on the catch-all nature of situational relevance. No connections between the user criteria and socio-cognitive relevance are found. The result indicates that relevance can be considered as a system and the relevance judgement as a process in which there are certain determined stages. === Uppsatsnivå: D
author Sjöstrand, Iréne
author_facet Sjöstrand, Iréne
author_sort Sjöstrand, Iréne
title Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning
title_short Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning
title_full Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning
title_fullStr Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning
title_full_unstemmed Vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : En litteraturundersökning
title_sort vad ligger till grund för användares relevansbedömningar? : en litteraturundersökning
publisher Högskolan i Borås, Institutionen Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap / Bibliotekshögskolan
publishDate 2003
url http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hb:diva-16293
work_keys_str_mv AT sjostrandirene vadliggertillgrundforanvandaresrelevansbedomningarenlitteraturundersokning
AT sjostrandirene whatarethebasesforusersrelevancejudgementsaninvestigationbasedonliterature
_version_ 1719021546570252288