Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete
I chose to study how the Swedish Air force carries out their work with setting goals for their work to improve flight safety and compare this with how the Swedish nuclear power plant Forsmark performs their work with improving nuclear safety. The study showed that both organisations have a lot to im...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Others |
Language: | Swedish |
Published: |
Försvarshögskolan
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-786 |
id |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-fhs-786 |
---|---|
record_format |
oai_dc |
spelling |
ndltd-UPSALLA1-oai-DiVA.org-fhs-7862013-01-08T13:25:49ZAtt göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbetesweSetting goals for your organisation : a comparison between the Swedish Air Force and the nuclear power plant ForsmarkHammarberg, AngelicaFörsvarshögskolan2010flight safetynuclear safetygoalsgoal oriented workorganizationsflygsäkerhetkärnkraftssäkerhetmålmålsättningsarbeteorganisationerSOCIAL SCIENCESSAMHÄLLSVETENSKAPI chose to study how the Swedish Air force carries out their work with setting goals for their work to improve flight safety and compare this with how the Swedish nuclear power plant Forsmark performs their work with improving nuclear safety. The study showed that both organisations have a lot to improve on in their ways of how to work. Especially when it comes to engaging the employees in the process, both in letting the employees be a part of coming up with areas to work on and in letting the employees evaluate which progress that has been made. It also showed that both organisations need to improve their methods for evaluating the work that has been done. This is especially important for the Air Force which evaluates on many levels and locations and did not have a set standard for how to conduct the evaluation. Although, Forsmark also needed to improve but on how to conduct the evaluation on more than one level in the organisation, allowing more people into the evaluation process and maybe letting someone not part of the process be a part of the evaluation to see things from a different perspective. Also, Forsmark had goals set which did not have a set time for when to evaluate them, which is another criteria for success. Student thesisinfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesistexthttp://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-786application/pdfinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
collection |
NDLTD |
language |
Swedish |
format |
Others
|
sources |
NDLTD |
topic |
flight safety nuclear safety goals goal oriented work organizations flygsäkerhet kärnkraftssäkerhet mål målsättningsarbete organisationer SOCIAL SCIENCES SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP |
spellingShingle |
flight safety nuclear safety goals goal oriented work organizations flygsäkerhet kärnkraftssäkerhet mål målsättningsarbete organisationer SOCIAL SCIENCES SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP Hammarberg, Angelica Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
description |
I chose to study how the Swedish Air force carries out their work with setting goals for their work to improve flight safety and compare this with how the Swedish nuclear power plant Forsmark performs their work with improving nuclear safety. The study showed that both organisations have a lot to improve on in their ways of how to work. Especially when it comes to engaging the employees in the process, both in letting the employees be a part of coming up with areas to work on and in letting the employees evaluate which progress that has been made. It also showed that both organisations need to improve their methods for evaluating the work that has been done. This is especially important for the Air Force which evaluates on many levels and locations and did not have a set standard for how to conduct the evaluation. Although, Forsmark also needed to improve but on how to conduct the evaluation on more than one level in the organisation, allowing more people into the evaluation process and maybe letting someone not part of the process be a part of the evaluation to see things from a different perspective. Also, Forsmark had goals set which did not have a set time for when to evaluate them, which is another criteria for success. |
author |
Hammarberg, Angelica |
author_facet |
Hammarberg, Angelica |
author_sort |
Hammarberg, Angelica |
title |
Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
title_short |
Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
title_full |
Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
title_fullStr |
Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
title_full_unstemmed |
Att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan Flygvapnets och Forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
title_sort |
att göra mål : en jämförande studie mellan flygvapnets och forsmarks sätt att sätta upp mål för säkerhetsarbete |
publisher |
Försvarshögskolan |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:fhs:diva-786 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT hammarbergangelica attgoramalenjamforandestudiemellanflygvapnetsochforsmarkssattattsattauppmalforsakerhetsarbete AT hammarbergangelica settinggoalsforyourorganisationacomparisonbetweentheswedishairforceandthenuclearpowerplantforsmark |
_version_ |
1716519848852324352 |